2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.92.190402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring a Photonic Qubit without Destroying It

Abstract: Measuring the polarisation of a single photon typically results in its destruction. We propose, demonstrate, and completely characterise a quantum non-demolition (QND) scheme for realising such a measurement non-destructively. This scheme uses only linear optics and photo-detection of ancillary modes to induce a strong non-linearity at the single photon level, non-deterministically. We vary this QND measurement continuously into the weak regime, and use it to perform a nondestructive test of complementarity in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
119
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The liability of this proposal is that one cannot detect what is happening while the coupling is turned off, so the qubit must have a reasonably high quality factor. However, this scheme has several advantages over the original proposal: (1) the coupling to the qubit needs only one qubit operator (the one we want to measure), (2) an arbitrary qubit Hamiltonian is allowed, (3) in the ideal case, no assumptions need to be made about the density matrix of the qubit, and (4) in the non-ideal case, the pulses may be noisy. These advantages make this kicked QND measurement feasible with existing technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liability of this proposal is that one cannot detect what is happening while the coupling is turned off, so the qubit must have a reasonably high quality factor. However, this scheme has several advantages over the original proposal: (1) the coupling to the qubit needs only one qubit operator (the one we want to measure), (2) an arbitrary qubit Hamiltonian is allowed, (3) in the ideal case, no assumptions need to be made about the density matrix of the qubit, and (4) in the non-ideal case, the pulses may be noisy. These advantages make this kicked QND measurement feasible with existing technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the mutual exclusivity of complementary wave and particle natures as expressed in BPC, the applied technique appears to allow us to circumvent the limitations imposed by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and the entanglement between the which-way marker and the interfering quantum object as employed in some welcher-weg experiments. (14)(15)(16)(17) Afshar's nonperturbative measurement technique (18)(19)(20) used in this work is conceptually different from quantum non-demolition (21) or non-destructive (22) techniques which do not destroy but perturb the photon wavefunction directly. The observation, that the presence of the wire grid decreases the photon count only negligibly, characterizes a confirmation null result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of this event is given by the expectation value of the projector OA optic axis). A weak measurement of the polarization is made by interacting the photon with another (meter) photon in a weak measurement device, which operates via measurementinduced nonlinearity [25]. The interaction of the two photons can be controlled using HWP 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, we make a weak, nondestructive measurement on the photon's polarization in the H ÿ V basis. The weak measurement is made using a nondeterministic generalized photon polarization measurement device [25], which is deemed to have worked whenever a single photon is present at each of the signal and meter outputs. The generalized measurement device works by entangling the signal photon's polarization with that of a meter photon prepared in the state jHi jVi, before measuring the meter photon's polarization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%