Measures of Productivity Change

O’Donnell, Christopher J.

doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2984-5_3

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…HMPI is defined as a ratio of aggregate output-quantity over aggregate input-quantity index (Bjurek et al, 1998). One HMPI advantage over other productivity indices, such as MPI, is that a choice between an input or output orientation is not required; HMPI exhibits a simultaneous input and output orientation, because it combines output and input quantity indices using the Shephard output and input distance functions, respectively (O'Donnell, 2011).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This latter approach is the MPI and the most commonly used index to examine productivity changes. MPI is preferred due to the following three main factors (Lovell, 2003;O'Donnell, 2011): (i) MPI can be computed without price data; (ii) the index can be decomposed into measures of technical (TCH) and efficiency (ECH) changes; and (iii) DEA linear programs to compute MPI have been incorporated into some software packages.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development and application of the Hicks-Moorsteen productivity index for the total factor productivity assessment of wastewater treatment plants

Molinos-Senante

Sala-Garrido

Hernández-Sancho

2016

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and application of the Hicks-Moorsteen productivity index for the total factor productivity assessment of wastewater treatment plants

Molinos-Senante

Sala-Garrido

Hernández-Sancho

2016

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The index satisfies both transitivity and identity axioms, making this index suitable for multi-temporal and multi-firm comparisons of TFP and efficiency (O'Donnell, 2011). Malmquist TFP index can be decomposed into technical efficiency change, scale efficiency change, technological change, and TFP change.…”

Section: Fare-primont Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The index is the ratio of two indexes defined by Fare and Primont (1995) and is used by O’Donnell (2010, 2011). The output index and input index can be written as…”

Section: Deterministic Frontier Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manufacturing Productivity Measurement in India: An Evolutionary Trend

Joshi,

Gopinathan

2024

The Indian Economic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We undertake an extensive literature survey and segregate the methods mainly into two approaches: parametric and non-parametric. Further, we categorise the non-parametric techniques into the Growth Accounting Approach and the Deterministic Frontier Approach. The evaluation and development of methods used in the study of productivity growth measurement is a continuous process over the years, even if we found a longstanding critical debate from the classical school, popularly known as the Cambridge controversy. This article presents a holistic review of methods for documenting the growth debates in independent India, which helps understand the concepts for the new researcher in the field and the policymakers in the developing and less developed countries. JEL Codes: D24, E24, O47

show abstract

“…Scale efficiency relates to productivity (dis)improvements that arise from (dis)economies of scale. Scale efficiency change typically arise from changes in relative prices or other production incentives (O'Donnell, 2011), such as fiscal incentives. Cross‐border acquisitions might decrease average costs or reduce the costs of inputs, leading to higher firm output and economies of scale (Bertrand & Zitouna, 2008).…”

Section: Links Between Cross‐border Acquisitions and Productivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of cross‐border acquisitions on firms' productivity in the EU

Gregori,

Martinez‐Cillero,

Nardo

2023

World Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study empirically investigates the extent to which firms in the European Union, once acquired through a cross‐border acquisition, show different productivity levels as compared to those firms that have not been acquired. Our identification strategy relies on the combination of Propensity Scores and the Staggered Difference‐in‐Difference estimator, using firms' balance sheet data for the years 2008–2018. We find that cross‐border acquisitions decrease the productivity of the acquired firms, especially in the manufacturing sector, both high‐ and low‐tech. We also find evidence of origin and sector heterogeneity. Firms targeted by acquirers with ultimate owners originating in emerging market economies and Offshore Financial Centres also decrease productivity of target firms operating in high‐tech manufacturing sectors.

show abstract

Measures of Productivity Change

Cited by 4 publications

References 60 publications

Development and application of the Hicks-Moorsteen productivity index for the total factor productivity assessment of wastewater treatment plants

Development and application of the Hicks-Moorsteen productivity index for the total factor productivity assessment of wastewater treatment plants

Manufacturing Productivity Measurement in India: An Evolutionary Trend

The effects of cross‐border acquisitions on firms' productivity in the EU

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About