2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of outdoor play and independent mobility in children and youth: A methodological review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Time and range may be insufficient indicators for CIM or simply rarely used at this stage. Using GPS as an objective measure of CIM could provide a more comprehensive understanding of CIM time and CIM range as indicator of CIM [ 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time and range may be insufficient indicators for CIM or simply rarely used at this stage. Using GPS as an objective measure of CIM could provide a more comprehensive understanding of CIM time and CIM range as indicator of CIM [ 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should use Global Position Systems (GPS) to objectively measure destinations children visit along with a self-report measure (SMS or an app) to determine if the travel has been unaccompanied by adults. 57,58 While this study appears to be among the first studies to empirically investigate the physical (and social) environment factors associated with children's independent mobility to a friend's house and local shop, no objectively measured physical environment variables in the final models were significantly associated with independent mobility to these destinations. This may be due to a lack of a context-specific measure for friend's house (eg, distance to closest friend's house) and the sample size.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Adolescents’ IM is commonly assessed by means of a questionnaire [ 41 ]. In the current study, we asked adolescents about the average time they spent travelling without accompaniment per trip in a usual week, separately for (i) walking, (ii) cycling, and (iii) using public transport in order to assess adolescents’ IM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Carver et al reported that children’s and adolescents’ perceptions of safety were higher than the parental perception, and were more strongly related to active commuting in the neighborhood [ 39 ] and Schoeppe et al related higher rates of IM when parents had a higher educational level and reported higher social connection [ 40 ]. Systematic reviews about IM assessed the methodological approach [ 41 ] or its relation to physical activity and weight status [ 15 ]. To the best of our knowledge, the relation between parents’ and adolescents’ perception of traffic- and crime-related safety and their association with IM has not been studied before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%