2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2020.101486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of inhibitory control correlate between different tasks but do not predict problem-solving success in a fish, Poecilia reticulata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings confirm individual differences in inhibition of action found in guppies using a variant of the detour-reaching task [30] and in pheasants using a response inhibition task [33]. Montalbano et al [32] demonstrated individual differences in guppies and showed positive covariation between two different measures of inhibition of action (the tube task and the cylinder task). However, another study in pheasants did not demonstrate a stable individual variation using common tasks of inhibitory control (detour-reaching task and reversal-learning task [35]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These findings confirm individual differences in inhibition of action found in guppies using a variant of the detour-reaching task [30] and in pheasants using a response inhibition task [33]. Montalbano et al [32] demonstrated individual differences in guppies and showed positive covariation between two different measures of inhibition of action (the tube task and the cylinder task). However, another study in pheasants did not demonstrate a stable individual variation using common tasks of inhibitory control (detour-reaching task and reversal-learning task [35]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Inconsistent effect of age and sex could also be due to our small sample size. However, studies looking specifically at individual differences in guppies had a sample size going from 22 to 28 individuals [30][31][32]37,101]. A low sample size, a common limitation when working with primates, might have decreased the power of our analysis [112].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations