Measures of Coping for Psychological Well-Being

Greenaway, Katharine H.; Louis, Winnifred R.; Parker, Stacey L.; Kalokerinos, Elise K.; Smith, Joanne R.; Terry, Deborah J.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386915-9.00012-7

Cited by 44 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 117 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Também, os itens de Aceitação de Responsabilidade que envolvem o reconhecimento de culpa são requisitos para a manifestação de estratégias de enfrentamento de estresse. Apenas aceitar algumas situações que não podem ser mudadas pode ser uma estratégia em si, mas a responsabilização, principalmente no contexto universitário, exige a realização de outras ações, para além dela, o que pode justificar a extinção do fator (Greenaway et al 2015).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Os itens do fator Fuga-esquiva se dividiram entre os fatores Reavaliação Positiva e Afastamento e Aceitação na versão atual. Isso é pertinente pois a estratégia de fuga-esquiva pode estar relacionada tanto a um processo de afastamento, quando o indivíduo não quer lidar com algo, como também a um processo de reavaliar a situação para entender se a fuga-esquiva é a melhor opção diante do gerador de estresse (Greenaway et al, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…McCrae e Costa (1986) relataram que as pessoas com altos níveis de bem-estar utilizam comportamentos de coping como a ação racional, a procura de ajuda, o extrair força da adversidade e a fé. Assim as teorias de coping estão baseadas na ideia de que, a fim de lidar com os problemas, as pessoas felizes desencadeiam pensamentos e comportamentos que são adaptáveis e úteis, visto que na média as pessoas infelizes enfrentam as dificuldades de maneira mais destrutivas (Diener, Suh, & Oishi, 1997;Greenaway, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Novas evidências de validade para o Inventário de Estratégias de Coping

Luca¹,

Noronha

Queluz

et al. 2020

CienciasPsi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O objetivo do presente estudo foi analisar as propriedades psicométricas do Inventário de Estratégias de Coping (IEC) por meio de evidências de validade baseadas na estrutura interna e na relação com outras variáveis (forças de caráter). Participaram 927 universitários, com idade média de 26 anos (DP= 7,7) e maioria do sexo feminino. Todos responderam ao Inventário de Estratégias de Coping e à Escala de Forças de Caráter (EFC). Após a análise dos dados, sugere-se uma nova organização fatorial com 4 fatores, dos 8 iniciais. Os fatores são: Reavaliação Positiva (α= 0,79), Afastamento e Aceitação (α= 0,79), Suporte Social (α= 0,67) e Confronto e Resolução de Problemas (α= 0,86). Os escores do IEC se correlacionaram com os escores da EFC, mostrando que a nova estrutura fatorial encontrada apresenta evidências de validade baseada nas relações com outras variáveis. Os resultados são discutidos à luz da literatura.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Novas evidências de validade para o Inventário de Estratégias de Coping

Luca¹,

Noronha

Queluz

et al. 2020

CienciasPsi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While this is largely a consensus view, there remain multiple options to operationalize coping. Available measurement models demonstrate the complexity of the construct, with coping variously construed as an outcome, process, behavior, and a set of either trait-based or state-based strategies or styles (Greenaway et al, 2015;Schwarzer & Schwarzer, 1996;Skinner, Edge, Altman, & Sherwood, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Coping strategies are practical behavioral or cognitive techniques of which examples are humor, self-blame, positive reappraisal, distancing, planning, self-pity, and information searching (Greenaway et al, 2015;Schwarzer & Schwarzer, 1996;Skinner et al, 2003). It is common practice for scales to be developed by nominating individual items that characterize specific coping strategies such as these.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The pragmatic derivation and validation of measures of adaptive and maladaptive coping styles

Brown

Bond

2019

Cogent Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There remain challenges involving the theoretical and empirical variability of the operationalization of coping styles. The current analyses sought to identify a parsimonious number of coping styles, from the commonly used Ways of Coping Questionnaire presented in dispositional format, and present internal consistency, construct validity and effectiveness information for the obtained scales. Data were collected from 317 adult community participants. Measures assessed coping, personality, stress, and demographic characteristics such as age and gender. Factor analyses identified that only two unique constructs, and therefore subscales, could be supported by the available data. However, three reliable parallel versions for each coping style, comprising 20, 10 and 5 items, respectively, were able to be derived. Face validity led to these uncorrelated scales being termed adaptive and maladaptive coping. Personality, stress and demographic details provided initial construct validity for these scales. This research proposes empirically sound measures for adaptive and maladaptive coping styles in dispositional format derived from a popular existing instrument. The independence of the scales demonstrates the fundamental distinction between styles, while the availability of scales of differing length with equal reliability offers particular value. These new options will provide clarity and consistency in the quantification of two commonly cited coping styles. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Lynsey Brown is a Research Fellow at Flinders University. While her predominant research focus is ageing, she also has a more general interest in health psychology, particularly stress and coping. Malcolm Bond is an applied health psychologist whose research encompasses the psychosocial evaluation of the reaction and adaptation to chronic disease. Research areas include social gerontology (particularly caregiver wellbeing), social-cognitive psychology, stress and coping, abnormal illness behaviour, and health-related decision-making (including motivation and health behaviour change).

show abstract

Coping with identity threat and health literacy on the quality of life and mental health in students: Structural equation modeling

Ataei¹,

Saeieh

Yazdkhasti³

et al. 2023

Neuropsychopharm Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quality of life is defined as the individual's understandings of his/ her position in life and the culture of the society in which they live.Quality of life is a multidimensional concept and can be measured through physical, physiological, social, and psychological dimensions. 1 The quality of life is affected by various factors such as stress, anxiety, and mental health disorders. 2 It is very important to pay attention to the quality of life of students during their studies, which is a very stressful period. 3

show abstract

Measures of Coping for Psychological Well-Being

Cited by 44 publications

References 117 publications

Novas evidências de validade para o Inventário de Estratégias de Coping

Novas evidências de validade para o Inventário de Estratégias de Coping

The pragmatic derivation and validation of measures of adaptive and maladaptive coping styles

Coping with identity threat and health literacy on the quality of life and mental health in students: Structural equation modeling

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About