2012
DOI: 10.1080/10720537.2012.651071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Cognitive Complexity and Its Development in Chinese Adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in CC we document occurred informally within, perhaps even in spite of, existing organizational structures. While studies have examined the development of CC in adolescents (Zhang et al, 2012), to our knowledge, no longitudinal studies have previously quantified informal changes in adults’ CC through interventions like international assignments. Some studies have used the RCQ to measure the impact of 13-week structured training interventions on university students’ CC (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in CC we document occurred informally within, perhaps even in spite of, existing organizational structures. While studies have examined the development of CC in adolescents (Zhang et al, 2012), to our knowledge, no longitudinal studies have previously quantified informal changes in adults’ CC through interventions like international assignments. Some studies have used the RCQ to measure the impact of 13-week structured training interventions on university students’ CC (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end, this technique provides a qualitative and quantitative data matrix (see Figure 1) that allows the computing of several cognitive structure measures, such as differentiation, polarization, discrepancies between Actual Self, Ideal Self, and Others (as perceived by the interviewee), as well as several measures of psychological conflict [24][25][26]. Compared to more widely used instruments, the RGT provides idiographic self-knowledge (concerning content and organization patterns) and allows qualitative and quantitative standardized measures, a recommended combination to assess self-knowledge organization [12][13][14].…”
Section: The Perspective Of Personal Construct Psychology On Self-knomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the constructs (and measures) utilized across the literature vary greatly, making them difficult to compare to each other, thus challenging or hampering researchers and practitioners' efforts to obtain a comprehensive understanding of their role in the organization of self-knowledge (e.g., [12,13]). Third, some authors defend the superiority of idiographic data to assess self-structure, but measures based on (self-) descriptions provided by researchers prevail [12,14]. Finally, certain variables considered central in theory have been underrepresented in research, as it is the case of internal conflicts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, it is the relative amount of different dimensions that are taken into account when one makes judgments on something. The more dimensional constructs are used to view the world, the more cognitively complex one is (Zhang et al., 2012). This is because an individual can process data from multiple dimensions (Goodwin & Ziegler, 1998).…”
Section: Aed and Cognitive Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%