2020
DOI: 10.1002/acr.24364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Cognition in Rheumatic Diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) lack of validated diagnostic biomarkers of CD; (4) the heterogeneous study populations of SLE patients in observational studies [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(3) lack of validated diagnostic biomarkers of CD; (4) the heterogeneous study populations of SLE patients in observational studies [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, CD, defined as a significant deficit in any of the cognitive domains of simple or complex attention, reasoning, executive skills, memory, visual-spatial processing, language and psychomotor speed [ 2 ], afflicts 3% to 88% of SLE patients [ 3 – 6 ]. Reasons on the wide variation in the reported prevalence of CD in SLE include: (1) lack of consensus in screening tools for the identification of CD in SLE—the current gold standard is the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) battery, which is limited by cost and time burden, making it more feasible for use in research rather than clinical settings; (2) difficulty in attributing CD to SLE; (3) lack of validated diagnostic biomarkers of CD; (4) the heterogeneous study populations of SLE patients in observational studies [ 7 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations