2020
DOI: 10.1002/acr.24235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Adult Knee Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 218 publications
(411 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with previously reported MDCs for PROMs in knee OA, our average net change in scores for each significant KOOS and OKS value surpassed the 90% confidence interval for the MDC (MDC90). 18,[33][34][35] For the LKS and VAS, however, the MDC90 was surpassed at all time points for each survey, despite statistical significance only being found at 6 weeks and 3 months for LKS and 2 weeks for VAS. 36,37 UCLA also was found to surpass the minimal clinically important difference by 6 weeks and 3 months, despite no statistically significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…When compared with previously reported MDCs for PROMs in knee OA, our average net change in scores for each significant KOOS and OKS value surpassed the 90% confidence interval for the MDC (MDC90). 18,[33][34][35] For the LKS and VAS, however, the MDC90 was surpassed at all time points for each survey, despite statistical significance only being found at 6 weeks and 3 months for LKS and 2 weeks for VAS. 36,37 UCLA also was found to surpass the minimal clinically important difference by 6 weeks and 3 months, despite no statistically significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The subscales have multiple 5-point Likert scale questions with responses ranging from 0 (i.e., no dysfunction) to 4 (i.e., worst dysfunction). Each subscale was converted to a score from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating no patient-reported disability (25,26). A PASS threshold for each KOOS subscale has previously been established in participants post-ACLR: symptoms >57.1%, pain >88.9%, QoL >62.5, ADL >100.0%, and sports >75.0 (Table 1) (23).…”
Section: Koosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, scores for the 10 adult participants (mean 75 ± 19) were significantly lower than those from nonsurgical, age, and sex matched unaffected adults (mean 84.7–95.5 ± 8.2–16.2), indicating more symptoms and poor overall function in our adults with aggrecan deficiency (Anderson et al, 2006; Nasreddine et al, 2017). The minimal detectable change has been reported to be in the 9–16 range for adults and 12 for pediatric IKDC (McHugh et al, 2020). Similarly, the ODI scores for low back pain and function were 0.22 ± 0.67 in pediatric subjects, indicating no disability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no other significant stance phase kinematic differences between affected adult relatives and controls with the exception of stance-related coronal plane (left) knee abduction, which was significantly more abducted (p = 0.03) for controls compared to affected adult relatives (14.7 ± 3.2 vs. 10.2 ± 5.0 ). adults and 12 for pediatric IKDC (McHugh et al, 2020). Similarly, the ODI scores for low back pain and function were 0.22 ± 0.67 in pediatric subjects, indicating no disability.…”
Section: Musculoskeletal Assessment and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 90%