2009
DOI: 10.2478/v10127-009-0015-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures: continuity, measurability, duality, extension

Abstract: ABSTRACT. We discuss some basic ideas and survey some fundamental constructions related to measure (a real-valued map the domain of which is a set of measurable objects carrying a suitable structure and the map partially preserves the structure): continuity, measurability, duality, extension. We show that in the category ID of difference posets of fuzzy sets and sequentially continuous difference-homomorphisms these constructions are intrinsic. Further, basic notions of the probability theory have natural gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19]). Second, we can extend the domain of functions and such extensions have stochastic applications, e.g., when studying the duality between generalized random variables and observables [5], [7], [8], [10], [14]- [16], [26].…”
Section: Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19]). Second, we can extend the domain of functions and such extensions have stochastic applications, e.g., when studying the duality between generalized random variables and observables [5], [7], [8], [10], [14]- [16], [26].…”
Section: Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The category ID of D-posets of fuzzy sets and sequentially continuous D-homomorphisms ( [28]) provides a natural background in which various classes of functions into [0,1] are objects and generalized probability measures, observables (dual maps to generalized random variables) are morphisms, and the extension of sequentially continuous maps is intrinsic (categorical), for example, both the extension of measures and the transition from measures to integrals can be viewed as an epireflection ([8], [9], [15]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%