1972
DOI: 10.1364/josa.62.001068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Turbulence Profiles in the Troposphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Typically, the C n 2 data come from temperature differences measured by fluctuations in the resistance of two, fine-wire, platinum or tungsten probes separated horizontally by approximately 1 m. Collecting C n 2 profiles with microthermal probe pairs carried by a balloon tends to be awkward and expensive. Consequently, this procedure has been used infrequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Typically, the C n 2 data come from temperature differences measured by fluctuations in the resistance of two, fine-wire, platinum or tungsten probes separated horizontally by approximately 1 m. Collecting C n 2 profiles with microthermal probe pairs carried by a balloon tends to be awkward and expensive. Consequently, this procedure has been used infrequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is indicated from the statistic analysis of the observation data that the temperature difference between both ends of the link varies obviously in the case of the daytime or whole day; however, the distinct variations of the relative humidity difference appear basically in the case of the whole day. The amplitude of temperature difference is larger than that of the relative humidity difference on March 4, 9 and 10, the opposite situation occurs in March 7,8,11,12,13,14,15,18 and 22, and there is a rough balance between them on March 16 and 23. In comparison with the variations of temperature and relative humidity difference, the wind speed difference varies greatly and irregularly, and the pressure difference changes smally and stably.…”
Section: Experimental Sites Equipments and Observation Datamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Using the refitted macrometeorology model of C 2 n to statistically analyse the observation data for 20 days, we find that there is good agreement between the predicted values and the scintillometer observations for days of March 6,14,15,16,17,18,21,22 and 23; however, a poor agreement is observed at night and during the wee hours for days of March 4, 5 and 13, around sunset for days of March 7, 8, 10, 11 and 20, and throughout the day for days of March 9, 12 and 19. Taking the typical observation data of March 4,8,9 and 23, for example, the predictions of offshore macrometeorology model of C 2 n for the above four cases are shown in Figure 7. In combination with the meteorological records and observations, case (a) mainly appears in sunny day where there are usually obvious temperature variations correspondingly with great C 2 n values.…”
Section: Offshore Macrometeorology Model Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations