2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5042407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of thermal conductivity across the B1-B2 phase transition in NaCl

Abstract: Impact ignition and combustion of micron-scale aluminum particles pre-stressed with different quenching rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The g was derived by linearly fitting the data: g = 5.5(± 0.2) and 5.5(± 0.5) for B1 and B2 phase, respectively. Our g values are in reasonable agreement with theoretical estimates 32 , 35 , while larger than those reported in Ref. 32 where the g value was determined by only two experimental data points in each phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The g was derived by linearly fitting the data: g = 5.5(± 0.2) and 5.5(± 0.5) for B1 and B2 phase, respectively. Our g values are in reasonable agreement with theoretical estimates 32 , 35 , while larger than those reported in Ref. 32 where the g value was determined by only two experimental data points in each phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The reduction of thermal conductivity across the B1–B2 transition, almost 70%, is in reasonable agreement with those modeled using several simple interatomic potentials 33 , but much larger than that reported in Ref. 32 (only ~ 37%), where the reduction was not sampled right across the phase transition.
Figure 1 Pressure dependence of the thermal conductivity of NaCl at room temperature.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 154 ] proposed a pressure thermal switch based on the B1 (face‐centered cubic) to B2 (body‐centered cubic) phase transition in NaCl. [ 154 ] Originally, this structure was not presented as a thermal switch, but the data of the changes in the thermal conductivity were equal to a switching ratio of ≈1.6. [ 154 ]…”
Section: Thermal Switchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 154 ] Originally, this structure was not presented as a thermal switch, but the data of the changes in the thermal conductivity were equal to a switching ratio of ≈1.6. [ 154 ]…”
Section: Thermal Switchesmentioning
confidence: 99%