2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of the wall-shear stress distribution in turbulent channel flow using the micro-pillar shear stress sensor MPS3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the energy spectra of the WSS gives indication of this aeroelastic behavior [12]. No distinct resonance peak appears for the current setup, which is in accordance with the findings of Liu et al [27]. Hence, no frequency limitation occurs for the investigated settings.…”
Section: Micro-pillar Shear-stress Sensor (Mps 3 )supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the energy spectra of the WSS gives indication of this aeroelastic behavior [12]. No distinct resonance peak appears for the current setup, which is in accordance with the findings of Liu et al [27]. Hence, no frequency limitation occurs for the investigated settings.…”
Section: Micro-pillar Shear-stress Sensor (Mps 3 )supporting
confidence: 91%
“…In previous measurements (e.g., [27]), a continuous laser light sheet was used to illuminate a plane parallel to the measurement surface exposing reflective hollow spheres that were attached to the tips of the micro pillars. This setup requires a careful adjustment of the light sheet, since large micro-pillar deflections can move the micro-pillar tip out of the illuminated plane.…”
Section: Micro-pillar Shear-stress Sensor (Mps 3 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brücker [25] used micropillar sensors to measure the topology of the wall-shear stress vector in a ZPG TBL at Re τ 940, and identified a probability of finding backflow events of around 0.05%, aligned with the results by Lenaers et al [17] at approximately the same Re. Note that micro-pillar sensors, based on correlating the deflection of small flexible pillars on the wall and the shear stress, provide accurate measurements of the τ w fluctuations (where τ w is the wall-shear stress), as well as their spatial correlations [26][27][28][29]. Thus, Brücker [25] was able to determine that backflow events are correlated with strong spanwise gradients of the wall-shear stress, and characterised the topology of critical points (defined as points where both the wall-shear stress and the surface vorticity are zero).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the oil-film based techniques cannot be applied at cryogenic conditions, and their application is obviously challenging in flight tests [ 50 ]. The Micro-Pillar Shear-Stress Sensor (MPS 3 ) [ 51 , 52 ] also enables global skin-friction measurements via a high-resolution array of micro-pillars, flush-mounted on the surface of interest. Besides the necessary surface preparation, the requirements on the micro-pillar geometry and materials currently limit their application in air flows to moderate Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%