2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.84.044331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of the48Ca(γ,n)reaction

Abstract: The48 Ca(γ,n) cross section was measured using γ-ray beams of energies between 9.5 and 15.3 MeV generated at the Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL) high-intensity γ-ray source (HIγS). Prior to this experiment, no direct measurements had been made with γ-ray beams of sufficiently low energy spread to observe structure in this energy range. The cross sections were measured at thirty-four different γ-ray energies with an enriched 48 Ca target. Neutron emission is the dominant decay mechanism in the m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The (γ,n) cross sections and thus the B(M1)↑ value deduced in Ref. [21] is almost twice that obtained in Ref. [20], while the cross sections at higher γ energies agree with those deduced from an (e,e n) experiment [22].…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The (γ,n) cross sections and thus the B(M1)↑ value deduced in Ref. [21] is almost twice that obtained in Ref. [20], while the cross sections at higher γ energies agree with those deduced from an (e,e n) experiment [22].…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…While we cannot provide an explanation, we note that a similar kind of discrepancy exists for the prominent neutron spin-flip M1 transition in 48 Ca whose strength plays a central role in understanding the phenomenon of quenching of the spin-isospin response [19]. It was first observed in electron scattering [20] and recently remeasured [21] with the same experimental technique as used in Ref. [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For KB3G, GPFX1A and GPFX1J the energy of the strongest 1 + state in 48 Ca is 9.3, 10.9 and 10.2 MeV, respectively, compared to the experimental value of 10.23 MeV (the KB3G strength is split between two states at 9.21 and 9.36 MeV). The calculated B(M1)↑ for the strong 1 + states is 4.7, 4.9 and 5.5 µ 2 N , respectively, compared to experimental values of 3.9(3) µ 2 N obtained with the (e,e ′ ) reaction [28,50] and 6.8(5) µ 2 N obtained with the (γ,n) reaction [51]. The latter value was recently claimed to be inconsistent with data on (p,p ′ ) reactions [52].…”
Section: B Theoretical Analysis Of the M1-strength Distributionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This is due to the fact that the Lorentzian kernel is a representation of the delta-function (for Γ = 0 the transform coincides with the response). While the comparison shows that the experimental centroid of the GDR is well reproduced by a calculation that neglects three-body forces, the inversion of the transform leads to a less pronounced peak with respect to experiment (see Aiming at addressing ab initio the interesting case of 48 Ca, for which recent photoabsorption measurements have been performed [15], we have calculated the LIT of its N=Z partner 40 Ca. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%