2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of the laminar burning velocity of hydrogen–air premixed flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) (note that recent work points out that the extrapolation using Eq. (2) is only valid under certain conditions, which might not have been respected by these works [26,27]). The open symbols denote other measurements that did not take stretch rate effects into account, as reported by Liu and MacFarlane [28], Milton and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(2) (note that recent work points out that the extrapolation using Eq. (2) is only valid under certain conditions, which might not have been respected by these works [26,27]). The open symbols denote other measurements that did not take stretch rate effects into account, as reported by Liu and MacFarlane [28], Milton and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…S22-S41. 3.5. Laminar burning velocity and flame structure of H 2 mixtures Figures 7 and 8 show the laminar burning velocity of H 2 + air mixtures at 1 atm [7,8,[130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146] at room and elevated temperatures, respectively. It can be seen that both the current model and the previous version [6] agree well with the most recent experimental data in a wide range of equivalence ratios except very lean and very rich flames.…”
Section: Ignition Delaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then for a fixed pressure, Eq. Kinetic Model [10] Krejci et al [12] Dahoe et al [13] Verhelst et al [14] Burke et al [15] Pareja et al [16] S (cm/s) can be reduced to the following form after using f(4) and a(4) from above,…”
Section: Correlation Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%