2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2844956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of the Influence of Acceleration and Temperature of Bodies on their Weight

Abstract: A brief review of experimental research of the influence of acceleration and temperatures of test mass upon gravitation force, executed between the 1990s and the beginning of 2000 is provided. According to a phenomenological notion, the acceleration of a test mass caused by external action, for example electromagnetic forces, results in changes of the gravitational properties of this mass. Consequences are a dependence upon gravity on the size and sign of test mass acceleration, and also on its absolute temper… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the nearly 12 hours of measurement time, this results in a maximum error for the temperature coefficient of < 5.1×10 −9 K −1 , which is an order of magnitude higher than the error bar of the linear regression analysis. Using this upper bound, we find α = 8.5 ± 5.1 × 10 −9 K −1 for copper, which is close to three orders of magnitude below the value reported by Dmitriev et al [4,5] (measured at a higher temperature range of 300-350 K). Given the error bars, we conclude that no change in weight of our copper sample was observable within our resolution between a temperature range of 84-230 K. A similar analysis was done for the superconductor samples but with less accuracy which is summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Test With Copper Sample and Lnsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Over the nearly 12 hours of measurement time, this results in a maximum error for the temperature coefficient of < 5.1×10 −9 K −1 , which is an order of magnitude higher than the error bar of the linear regression analysis. Using this upper bound, we find α = 8.5 ± 5.1 × 10 −9 K −1 for copper, which is close to three orders of magnitude below the value reported by Dmitriev et al [4,5] (measured at a higher temperature range of 300-350 K). Given the error bars, we conclude that no change in weight of our copper sample was observable within our resolution between a temperature range of 84-230 K. A similar analysis was done for the superconductor samples but with less accuracy which is summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Test With Copper Sample and Lnsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Thus of acceleration of particles at their vertical oscillations by an infinite set of derivatives on time from linear displacement are described. As it was marked in (Dmitriev, 2001(Dmitriev, , 2008a(Dmitriev, , 2009a) in these conditions it is possible to expect display of "nonclassical" properties of gravitation which mentioned some more D.Mendeleev . Free falling of masse oscillated along a vertical physically essentially differs from circular (orbital) movement of such masse.…”
Section: Free Falling Of a Mechanical Rotor With A Horizontal Axismentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The majority of these measurements were taken in a normal laboratory conditions, thus influence of artifacts -buoyancy (buoyancy force of pushing out in the atmosphere), temperature change of the sizes of a sample, thermal air convection, action of electric and magnetic fields were carefully considered. Various types of high-precision scales, various designs of the weighed containers, various materials of samples and various methods of their heating were used (ultrasound, a heat transfer from the electric heater and a chemical way) (Dmitriev, 2007;Dmitriev, 2008;Dmitriev, 2012a). One of the recent experiments showing negative temperature dependence of weight is described in (Dmitriev & Bulgakova, 2013).…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of Gravity Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of areas of change of phase structure of substance in which there are sharp changes of its weight, the main reason for the monotonous increasing temperature dependence of weight is considered action of forces of buoyancy. Meanwhile, physical temperature dependence of weight of bodies (Dmitriev, Nikushchenko, & Snegov, 2003;Dmitriev, 2007;Dmitriev, 2008;Dmitriev, 2012a;Dmitriev & Bulgakova, 2013) has essential impact on measurements of weight and has to be taken into account in the exact thermogravimetric analysis; this circumstance was noted by Grumazesku (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation