2000
DOI: 10.13182/nt00-a3088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of the Effective Diffusion Coefficient of Dissolved Oxygen and Oxidation Rate of Pyrite by Dissolved Oxygen in Compacted Sodium Bentonite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cementation factor reflects the tortuosity in a porous material which affects the transport of dissolved species, a decrease in porosity resulting in an exponential decrease of the diffusion coefficient. The value of m is determined by fitting the effective diffusion coefficient measured at the Bure site [7]: / = 15% and D eff = 10 À11 m 2 s À1 give m = 2.5, considering a temperature of 298 K. This value is consistent with other studies on clayey materials [13][14][15].…”
Section: System Studiedsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The cementation factor reflects the tortuosity in a porous material which affects the transport of dissolved species, a decrease in porosity resulting in an exponential decrease of the diffusion coefficient. The value of m is determined by fitting the effective diffusion coefficient measured at the Bure site [7]: / = 15% and D eff = 10 À11 m 2 s À1 give m = 2.5, considering a temperature of 298 K. This value is consistent with other studies on clayey materials [13][14][15].…”
Section: System Studiedsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, negative deviations from the parabolic relation were observed in the initial period and positive deviations in the last period shown as a dashed line, indicating that the growth rate gradually became faster. In the case where the growth is controlled by pore diffusion, 16,17 the relation between t and L is written as…”
Section: D72mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.10). The obtained values in this study are in the same order as the values reported by Smith and Schumate (1970) who found a value of 0.7 for a mixture of pyrite and marcasite, or Kamei and Ohmoto (2000), Manaka et al (2000), and Manaka (2007) with values from 0.5 to 1 for pyrite, or McKibben (1984), Williamson and Rimstidt (1994) and Domènech et al (2002) for pyrite (0.4-0.5±0.04) at pH 2-10. In the case of arsenopyrite, the obtained value is higher than those reported by Yu et al (2007)…”
Section: The Effect Of Dissolved Oxygen On Dissolution Ratessupporting
confidence: 89%