2010
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future

Abstract: The rate of spontaneous mutation in natural populations is a fundamental parameter for many evolutionary phenomena. Because the rate of mutation is generally low, most of what is currently known about mutation has been obtained through indirect, complex and imprecise methodological approaches. However, in the past few years genome-wide sequencing of closely related individuals has made it possible to estimate the rates of mutation directly at the level of the DNA, avoiding most of the problems associated with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two major experimental approaches have been used to study the effects of mutations on fitness (van Harten, 1998; Kondrashov & Kondrashov, 2010). First, mutation accumulation (MA) studies reduce the strength of selection on experimental populations, allowing spontaneous mutations to accumulate by drift (Halligan & Keightley, 2009; Mukai, 1964).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two major experimental approaches have been used to study the effects of mutations on fitness (van Harten, 1998; Kondrashov & Kondrashov, 2010). First, mutation accumulation (MA) studies reduce the strength of selection on experimental populations, allowing spontaneous mutations to accumulate by drift (Halligan & Keightley, 2009; Mukai, 1964).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, this has been accomplished mainly by finding single genes or groups of genes that lead to phenotypic changes that can easily be observed in populations with known descent (Drake et al 1998) and extrapolating to the level of genomes. As Kondrashov & Kondrashov (2010) point out in their contribution to this issue, the recent advances in post-genomic sequencing technology have led to breakthroughs that now allow direct determination of mutation rates in species with sequenced genomes, work which Charlesworth has stimulated by his developments of theory and to which he has contributed directly (Haag-Liautard et al 2007). Future work in this area is important because accurate estimates of mutation rates at different sites and in different species can be important for testing alternative theories.…”
Section: Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate estimation of the mutation rate is made difficult by the very low rate of spontaneous mutagenesis, so most estimates have been indirect, relying on DNA divergence at putatively neutral sites between species or on phenotypic screens. These approaches make several assumptions that are difficult to validate (including evolutionary divergence dates and generation intervals), limiting their precision and accuracy (reviewed by Kondrashov and Kondrashov 2010). Recently, a few studies have begun to estimate the mutation rate through direct sequencing of lines that have accumulated mutations for multiple generations or by the sequencing of parents and their offspring (Caenorhabditis elegans, Denver et al 2009;Drosophila melanogaster, Haag-Liautard et al 2007;Keightley et al 2009; Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lynch et al 2008; Arabidopsis thaliana, Ossowski et al 2010; Homo sapiens, Xue et al 2009;Roach et al 2010;Conrad et al 2011;Kong et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%