2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.690138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of refractive variability in the marine boundary layer in comparison with mesoscale meteorological model predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, e and T represent water vapor pressure and temperature, respectively. Considering the influence of the curvature of the Earth, the corrected atmospheric refractive index is expressed as follows (Forster and Riechen, 2006):…”
Section: Atmospheric Refraction Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, e and T represent water vapor pressure and temperature, respectively. Considering the influence of the curvature of the Earth, the corrected atmospheric refractive index is expressed as follows (Forster and Riechen, 2006):…”
Section: Atmospheric Refraction Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of measurement campaigns have also been conducted in the Baltic sea, mainly focused on studying evaporation ducts. During these campaigns a combination of in situ measurements, radiosondes, and microwave measurements were performed and reported (see, e.g., Scholz and Förster, 2003;Förster et al, 2004;Essen et al, 2004;Förster and Riechen, 2006;Essen et al, 2012;Danklmayer et al, 2013Danklmayer et al, , 2015Danklmayer et al, , 2016a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%