2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.112001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of production and inelastic cross sections for p+C , p+Be , and <

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NA61/SHINE measured the yields and the production cross-sections for T2K experiment (31 GeV/c proton on graphite targets) using both thin and replica targets. SHINE reported uncertainties in the production and inelastic cross-sections of the order of O(2-8%) for p+C, p+Be and p+Al at 60 and 120 GeV/c (see e.g., [106]). Before the CERN LS2, it also performed additional measurements for NuMI and recently extended beyond LS2 to serve DUNE, Hyper-Kamiokande and, possibly, NP06/ENUBET.…”
Section: Hadron Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NA61/SHINE measured the yields and the production cross-sections for T2K experiment (31 GeV/c proton on graphite targets) using both thin and replica targets. SHINE reported uncertainties in the production and inelastic cross-sections of the order of O(2-8%) for p+C, p+Be and p+Al at 60 and 120 GeV/c (see e.g., [106]). Before the CERN LS2, it also performed additional measurements for NuMI and recently extended beyond LS2 to serve DUNE, Hyper-Kamiokande and, possibly, NP06/ENUBET.…”
Section: Hadron Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our measurement results compared with previous data compiled by Refs. [12][13][14][15] are shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Calculation Of Interaction Probabilities and Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measurement was performed by irradiating a plastic scintillator target with a proton beam and monitoring the 20.4 min 11 C activity by the internal scintillation counting method. [12][13][14] and parameterizations [17][18][19]. Right: C+p → 11 C production cross section result compared with Evoli+19 [15], Webber+90 [20] and GALPROP [21] parameterizations.…”
Section: Calculation Of Interaction Probabilities and Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these data are very valuable, they are insufficient for the precise neutrino flux predictions due to low precision and lack of error covariances. In more recent years, experiments like NA61/SHINE [4][5][6][7], HARP [8,9] or MIPP [10][11][12] took valuable data with the direct requests and input from the neutrino experiments. These data include cross-section and hadron production measurement for various targets and beam momenta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%