A quasi coincident method selective to impact parameters has been employed to determine four out of five possible density matrix elements of the HeI 3 3p excited term after He+(ls)+Ne(2p6)~HeI(33P)+Ne+(?) collision processes for the He + energies from 10 to 355 keV.As one possible approach to the understanding of the microscopic mechanisms yielding the recently discovered large orientation of scattered ions (atoms) after ion-beam surface interaction at grazing incidence (IB-SIGI) [1][2][3][4][5] we investigate the orientation of scattered ions (atoms) resulting from ion-atom collisions with impact parameter selection. The experimental problem in such investigations is usually solved by time-consuming standard coincidence measurements [6]. In this communication we present an alternative, very effective quasi coincidence method, which allows to reduce the measuring time by several orders of magnitude as shown by first results obtained for the He+(1 s) + Ne(2p 6) ~ He(3 3p) + Ne +(?) collision process. It is the simple semi-classical density gradient model I-7] for IBSIGI in Figure l a which has led us to search for similarities of ion-atom and ion-surface interactions. This model relates the expectation value of the orbital angular momentum (1> of the electron excited during the collision to the density gradient of electrons at the surface, i.e. to the difference of electrons interacting with the "upper or lower hemisphere" of the ion, and to the velocity of the ion via (l>~17ne x v. Approximating an atom by an electron gas with a spherical density gradient in Figure 1 b one can thus expect the same gross characteristics for ionatom collisions when it is experimentally guaranteed that ions pass only "above" the atoms by impact parameter selection. From the details of such measurements one can then hope to deduce information on ion-atom and on specific aspects of the ion-surface interaction mechanisms.
,on9 . ". '.".,-:'.': ... surface atom In comparison to a standard coincidence experiment [9] in Figure 2c this quasi coincident technique in Figure 2a is limited to the observation of excited states of the projectile but offers great advantages for such studies with respect to the signal strength by several orders of magnitude. Consider only the true coincidences of an experiment in Figure 2c. Their rate C is given by the rate of projectiles S entering the scattering region times the probability ~2~ of being scattered and detected in the particle detector 0340-2193/78/0288/0335/$01.80