1975
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.34.444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Photon Polarization and Angular Correlations forHe+-He Collisions Coincidence Technique Using an Ion-Photon

Abstract: communicated during the construction of the apparatus 8 and the experimental data is satisfactory. The differences might be due to uncertainties of the experimental resonance cross sections or to the possible existence of a 6 2 S 1/2 autoionization transition 9 near 1300 A. According to the measurement the value P = -50% [where Q s ' = 0, Eq. (4)] is at the wave number 64 400 ± 600 cm" 1 . Since from Eq. (2) e 0 = -# 0 for Q s ' = 0, Eq.(3) together with the measurement yields T 0 q 0 = 5500 ±1200 cm" 1 for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the rate of random coincidences R=f21f22S2At, where At is the conversion time (A t ~ 10-8 s), is set equal to C one limits S to S= 1~At, which then yields for our example C~, 10-2 s-1. This is a value typically observed in most particle photon coincidence experiments [9]. In contrast no such limitation exists in our quasi-coincidence technique of Figure 2a.…”
Section: Experimental Impact Parameter Selectionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the rate of random coincidences R=f21f22S2At, where At is the conversion time (A t ~ 10-8 s), is set equal to C one limits S to S= 1~At, which then yields for our example C~, 10-2 s-1. This is a value typically observed in most particle photon coincidence experiments [9]. In contrast no such limitation exists in our quasi-coincidence technique of Figure 2a.…”
Section: Experimental Impact Parameter Selectionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…'.".,-:'. ': ... surface atom In comparison to a standard coincidence experiment [9] in Figure 2c this quasi coincident technique in Figure 2a is limited to the observation of excited states of the projectile but offers great advantages for such studies with respect to the signal strength by several orders of magnitude. Consider only the true coincidences of an experiment in Figure 2c.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(Note that the sublevels with M l = ±1 are mainly occupied at the interaction of helium ions with helium atoms [20,21]). Probably, the decrease of the polarization degree at the increase of the collision energy evidences of the increase of the magnetic sublevels population with M l = ±1.…”
Section: B300mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams [5]). Experimental data for excitation in ion-atom [6][7][8] and atom-atom collisions [9] have als0 been published. Few data are available for charge exchange processes which, so far, are limited to the charge exchange excitation of He(33p) in He +-atom or He § collisions [I0, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%