2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16244906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Oxidative Potential of Particulate Matter at Belgrade Tunnel; Comparison of BPEAnit, DTT and DCFH Assays

Abstract: To estimate the oxidative potential (OP) of particulate matter (PM), two commonly used cell-free, molecular probes were applied: dithiothreitol (DTT) and dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), and their performance was compared with 9,10-bis (phenylethynyl) anthracene-nitroxide (BPEAnit). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which the performance of the DTT and DCFH has been compared with the BPEAnit probe. The average concentrations of PM, organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 , while DCFH macrophage indicated a slight increase (by ~14%) in PM 2.5 oxidative potential from FL to PL2 phase, the DTT assay showed comparable PM 2.5 toxicity between the mentioned periods. This observation can be ascribed to the distinct characteristics of DCFH-DA and DTT probes, which demonstrate different levels of sensitivity to toxic PM species ( Jovanovic et al, 2019 ; Sauvain et al, 2013 ). Therefore, the mentioned discrepancies are within the experimental uncertainties in quantifying PM oxidative potential via various assays.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 , while DCFH macrophage indicated a slight increase (by ~14%) in PM 2.5 oxidative potential from FL to PL2 phase, the DTT assay showed comparable PM 2.5 toxicity between the mentioned periods. This observation can be ascribed to the distinct characteristics of DCFH-DA and DTT probes, which demonstrate different levels of sensitivity to toxic PM species ( Jovanovic et al, 2019 ; Sauvain et al, 2013 ). Therefore, the mentioned discrepancies are within the experimental uncertainties in quantifying PM oxidative potential via various assays.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also of high concern to improve the understanding of the PM sources in relation to such health impacts. Indeed, oxidative stress is now well recognized as one of the main biological mechanisms considered to be contributing to these detrimental impacts from air pollution exposure through the capability of PM to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the lung, which leads to proinflammatory responses that can ultimately result in apoptosis (Ayres et al, 2008;Baulig et al, 2003;Dhalla et al, 2000;Donaldson et al, 2001;Jin et al, 2018;Kelly, 2003;Mudway et al, 2020;Nel, 2005;Piao et al, 2018). The oxidative potential (OP) of PM, defined as the capability of PM to generate ROS/deplete anti-oxidants, makes an interesting complement to regulated metrics of ambient PM exposure (Bates et al, 2019;Guo et al, 2020;Gurgueira et al, 2002;Park et al, 2018;Shiraiwa et al, 2017;Valavanidis et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCF-based assay is probably the most commonly used test for detecting intracellular ROS and oxidative stress (Aranda et al, 2013;Jovanovic et al, 2019). The cell-permeable DCF diffuses into the cells and in the presence of ROS, rapidly oxidizes to 2 ′ ,7 ′ -dichlorofluorescein, which is highly fluorescent and works as a marker for intracellular ROS.…”
Section: Reactive Oxygen Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (Jovanovic et al, 2019). Details of the two ROS test methodology are provided in the Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Reactive Oxygen Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%