2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01944-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of (n,γ) neutron capture cross-sections with liquid scintillator detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PHWT is based on the off-line modification of the response function of the detector in such a way that the efficiency for capture cascades becomes proportional to the total γ -ray energy released in the event, independent of cascade multiplicity and the spectral shape of the γ spectrum [22][23][24]. The normalization to a reference cross section was performed by means of the saturated resonance technique [25] using the prominent 4.9-eV resonance in 197 Au.…”
Section: Determination Of Capture Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PHWT is based on the off-line modification of the response function of the detector in such a way that the efficiency for capture cascades becomes proportional to the total γ -ray energy released in the event, independent of cascade multiplicity and the spectral shape of the γ spectrum [22][23][24]. The normalization to a reference cross section was performed by means of the saturated resonance technique [25] using the prominent 4.9-eV resonance in 197 Au.…”
Section: Determination Of Capture Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, known as the pulse height weighting technique (PHWT), is described extensively elsewhere [41][42][43].…”
Section: B Determination Of the Capture Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique allows one to extract the cascade detection efficiency independently from the measured data. It was used in previous surrogate studies using the 232 Th( 3 He,p) reaction [10,11]. Once the detection efficiency is determined, we apply equation (8) figure 3 show that our surrogate data present big discrepancies with respect to the neutron-induced data, while we observe a very good agreement with the 176 Lu(γ,γ) calculation at low energies.…”
Section: Lu* Reactionmentioning
confidence: 65%