1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.55.588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of1H(d,γ)3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
121
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These numbers have not found their way into all subsequent work (e.g., Ref. [22]), and we know of no calculations that have incorporated either of the recent TUNL measurements of the d(p, γ) 3 He [15,16] cross section (save one reported in this last experimental reference). One of our goals is to provide a new standard calculation which incorporates these measurements so that they are not ignored in future theoretical work.…”
Section: A the Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These numbers have not found their way into all subsequent work (e.g., Ref. [22]), and we know of no calculations that have incorporated either of the recent TUNL measurements of the d(p, γ) 3 He [15,16] cross section (save one reported in this last experimental reference). One of our goals is to provide a new standard calculation which incorporates these measurements so that they are not ignored in future theoretical work.…”
Section: A the Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is encouraging that our splines indicate much the same energy dependence as the microscopic calculation [36,16], so the sparseness is probably not such a big problem. Our errors reflect the ∼ 8% normalization errors in the best measurements of the cross section.…”
Section: D(p γ) 3 Hementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We chose the second option, with Marcucci et al [20] [D(p,γ) 3 He] and Arai et al [21] [D(d,n) 3 He and D(d,p) 3 H] as theoretical S -factors, keeping the normalization (α) as a free parameter that has to be determined by comparison with experimental data. The procedure we followed [5] for the D(p,γ) 3 He reaction was i) to select experimental datasets [22][23][24][25] for which systematic uncertainties were provided, ii) determine for each data set, by χ 2 minimization, the normalization factor to be applied to the theoretical S -factor of Marcucci et al [20], iii) add quadratically the systematic uncertainties and iv) perform a weighted average of the normalization factor. We obtained α = 0.9900 ± 0.0368 for this factor, that was subsequently used to scale the Marcucci et al S -factor, and calculate the thermonuclear D(p,γ) 3 He reaction rate and associated uncertainty.…”
Section: LI and D Nucleosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Ratio of experimental [22][23][24][25], fitted [5,[27][28][29] and new theoretical [30] S -factors to the theoretical one [20]; the horizontal lines correspond to the theoretical S -factor scaled by α ± ∆α [5]. (Systematic uncertainties in the range 4.5-9% are not shown.…”
Section: LI and D Nucleosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%