Measurements of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift: A Pilot Clinical Study

Ajanović, Muhamed; Kamber-Ćesir, Alma; Hamzić, Adis; Tosum, Selma

doi:10.15644/asc49/3/5

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Jelusic et al 25 studied stability of the implant in sinus lifts with and without using a graft material, which were 78.9AE6.3 NCM and 78.7AE6.1 NCM respectively. Ajanovic et al 26 in a pilot study measured mean implant stability with various diameters of the implant by creating a window by lateral approach, and sinus elevation was 77.73AE2.93 NCM.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative efficacy of osteotome versus CAS kit-assisted indirect maxillary sinus lift and immediate implant placement in posterior atrophic maxilla: A clinico-radiological study

Shende,

Mundada,

Bhola

2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of conventional osteotome technique and CAS kit uses for indirect sinus lifting and immediate implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla. Methods: A total of 20 patients aged <18 years in which 60% males and 40% of females were included in this study requiring implant prosthesis in atrophic (RBH > 3mm) posterior maxilla with a minimum width of 6mm were included in the study. They were randomly divided into two groups by computerised allocation into one group undergoing sinus lift with osteotome, and the other with CAS kit. Statistical analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Dependent and independent variables were evaluated by the paired t-test and unpaired t-test respectively. A p<0.05 was set as the level of significance. Results: Mean duration for implant placement in the CAS group was 13.40±2.98 and in patients the osteotome group was 22.10±2.55. Mean primary stability in patients with CAS group was 44±6.14 and patients with osteotome group were 35.50±7.61. Mean amount of bone regeneration radiographic evaluation at three months in patients of CAS group was 4.99±0.86 and in patients of osteotome group was 5.59±1.21. The mean amount of bone regeneration radiographic evaluation at nine months in the CAS group was 5.53±0.77 and 6.34±1.11 in the osteotome group. Conclusions: CAS kit compared to osteotome was better in terms of operative time, primary stability, and marginal bone loss resulting in recommended modality.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative efficacy of osteotome versus CAS kit-assisted indirect maxillary sinus lift and immediate implant placement in posterior atrophic maxilla: A clinico-radiological study

Shende,

Mundada,

Bhola

2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is similar to natural apatite, which is the main mineral constitute of human bone and is the main structural component that provides its rigidity [ 39 ]. With a high rate of osseointegration and volume stability, it can produce regenerative results comparable to xenografts [ 7 , 40 , 41 ]. The use of synthetic materials has the advantage over other grafts (e.g., natural BSM such as allo- or xenogeneic materials), as their material properties can be adjusted [ 42 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ex Vivo and In Vivo Analyses of Novel 3D-Printed Bone Substitute Scaffolds Incorporating Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules for Bone Regeneration

Oberdiek¹,

Vargas

Rider³

et al. 2021

IJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: The aim of this study was examining the ex vivo and in vivo properties of a composite made from polycaprolactone (PCL) and biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) (synprint, ScientiFY GmbH) fabricated via fused deposition modelling (FDM); (2) Methods: Scaffolds were tested ex vivo for their mechanical properties using porous and solid designs. Subcutaneous implantation model analyzed the biocompatibility of PCL + BCP and PCL scaffolds. Calvaria implantation model analyzed the osteoconductive properties of PCL and PCL + BCP scaffolds compared to BCP as control group. Established histological, histopathological and histomorphometrical methods were performed to evaluate new bone formation.; (3) Results Mechanical testing demonstrated no significant differences between PCL and PCL + BCP for both designs. Similar biocompatibility was observed subcutaneously for PCL and PCL + BCP scaffolds. In the calvaria model, new bone formation was observed for all groups with largest new bone formation in the BCP group, followed by the PCL + BCP group, and the PCL group. This finding was influenced by the initial volume of biomaterial implanted and remaining volume after 90 days. All materials showed osteoconductive properties and PCL + BCP tailored the tissue responses towards higher cellular biodegradability. Moreover, this material combination led to a reduced swelling in PCL + BCP; (4) Conclusions: Altogether, the results show that the newly developed composite is biocompatible and leads to successful osteoconductive bone regeneration. The new biomaterial combines the structural stability provided by PCL with bioactive characteristics of BCP-based BSM. 3D-printed BSM provides an integration behavior in accordance with the concept of guided bone regeneration (GBR) by directing new bone growth for proper function and restoration.

show abstract

Measurements of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift: A Pilot Clinical Study

Cited by 2 publications

References 18 publications

Comparative efficacy of osteotome versus CAS kit-assisted indirect maxillary sinus lift and immediate implant placement in posterior atrophic maxilla: A clinico-radiological study

Comparative efficacy of osteotome versus CAS kit-assisted indirect maxillary sinus lift and immediate implant placement in posterior atrophic maxilla: A clinico-radiological study

Ex Vivo and In Vivo Analyses of Novel 3D-Printed Bone Substitute Scaffolds Incorporating Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules for Bone Regeneration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About