2012
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Elastic Moduli of Pharmaceutical Compacts: A New Methodology Using Double Compaction on a Compaction Simulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a case, it would then be justified to consider only Young's modulus. Nevertheless, it was reported in a previous work that this approximation is not always justified …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such a case, it would then be justified to consider only Young's modulus. Nevertheless, it was reported in a previous work that this approximation is not always justified …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The values of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were obtained using double compaction experiments as described elsewhere . In this methodology, the first compaction is used to obtain the compact and the elastic properties are measured during the beginning of the second compaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical behavior of the powder was modeled using Drucker-Prager Cap (DPC) model. The parameters required to conduct the simulation were determined as already described in the literature (Brewin et al, 2008;Diarra et al, 2012;Han et al, 2008;Mazel et al, 2012). The values for the model parameters for MCC powder were those proposed by Diarra et al (2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical behavior of the powder was modeled using the Drucker–Prager Cap model. The parameters required to conduct the simulation were determined as already described in the literature . The friction angle β determined from uniaxial and diametrical compression tests did not vary much and had a magnitude of about 69°.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%