2017
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710700079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of dynamic wind pressures on gable roofs – comparison with ČSN EN 1991-1-4

Abstract: Abstract. The contribution is dealing with the wind tunnel measurements of dynamic pressures on the canopy roofs. It compares experimentally determined pressure coefficients Cp with the values in ČSN EN 1991-1-4 and former code ČSN 73 0035 as well. The pressures are expressed by the dynamic values. Thus, the averaged values are presented together with the fluctuating part, which significantly contributes to the overall loading. The measurement is carried out at two roof models, two basic directions, and two tu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conversion of the results from the tunnel to the real scale is done through the external pressure coefficient Cp, which can be expressed as the ratio of the wind pressure on the surface of the difference model (Dp -the differential pressure measured directly by the pressure transducer between the total pressure recorded at point i and the static pressure on the Prandtl tube) and the reference mean dynamic pressure in the free stream 𝑝 (Pospisil et al 2017):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversion of the results from the tunnel to the real scale is done through the external pressure coefficient Cp, which can be expressed as the ratio of the wind pressure on the surface of the difference model (Dp -the differential pressure measured directly by the pressure transducer between the total pressure recorded at point i and the static pressure on the Prandtl tube) and the reference mean dynamic pressure in the free stream 𝑝 (Pospisil et al 2017):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%