2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2004.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of digitized objects with fuzzy borders in 2D and 3D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous work, it is shown that the precision of estimates of various properties of a continuous original shape is highly improved when derived from a fuzzy, instead of a crisp representation of a continuous object [4]. In this paper, we analyse the accuracy of the estimation of moments, when they are calculated from a fuzzy representation of a shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, it is shown that the precision of estimates of various properties of a continuous original shape is highly improved when derived from a fuzzy, instead of a crisp representation of a continuous object [4]. In this paper, we analyse the accuracy of the estimation of moments, when they are calculated from a fuzzy representation of a shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volume is easily estimated by counting the number of voxels that constitute an object. A number of surface area estimates of 3D objects exist in the literature [8,11,30]. A straightforward and simple way to obtain a surface area estimate of a 3D object is to count the number of foreground voxels with a surface neighbour in the background as in [19].…”
Section: Size Based Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A straightforward and simple way to obtain a surface area estimate of a 3D object is to count the number of foreground voxels with a surface neighbour in the background as in [19]. A more accurate surface area estimate is obtained through approximating the boundary of a triangular representation, using the marching cubes algorithm [13,30]. X-extent, Y-extent and Z-extent are computed from the minimum and maximum x, y, and z coordinates values of pixels within each peak component.…”
Section: Size Based Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By allowing mixed labels, it is possible to obtain segmentations with sub-pixel precision. Numerous studies have confirmed that pixel coverage segmentation [14] outperforms crisp segmentation for subsequent measuring of object properties such as length and area/volume, see, e.g., [13,15]. In [9], it is shown that consequently misplacing the tissue borders, in a brain volume having voxels of size 1 mm 3 , by one voxel resulted in volume errors of approximately 30%, 40% and 60% for white matter, grey matter and cerebrospinal fluid, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%