Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01439803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of differential cross sections fore-Ar, Kr, Xe scattering atE = 0.05 − 2 eV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
88
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of this comparative study, it is also concluded that the value of scattering length, (−6.51 ± 0.05)a 0 , derived from time of flight data by Ferch et al [30] is the most probable. This result is in very good agreement with the value of −6.527a 0 obtained using original MERT analysis applied to very-low-energy elastic DCSs by Weyhreter et al [13]. Moreover, it is also consistent with A = −6.5a 0 determined by O'Malley [11] from very old TCS by Ramsauer and Kollath [35].…”
Section: Total Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of this comparative study, it is also concluded that the value of scattering length, (−6.51 ± 0.05)a 0 , derived from time of flight data by Ferch et al [30] is the most probable. This result is in very good agreement with the value of −6.527a 0 obtained using original MERT analysis applied to very-low-energy elastic DCSs by Weyhreter et al [13]. Moreover, it is also consistent with A = −6.5a 0 determined by O'Malley [11] from very old TCS by Ramsauer and Kollath [35].…”
Section: Total Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The present results are compared at 1, 5, 7.9, and 10 eV with the experimental DCS of Register et al [46], Weyhreter et al [13], Gibson et al [47], and Linert et al [48] DCS ( [30]. The present results are compared at 30, 60, and 90 • with the experimental DCS of Weyhreter et al [13] and Gibson et al [47] experimental DCS data [13,[46][47][48] in Figs. 4 and 5.…”
Section: Differential Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the lower minimum is predicted to shift dramatically, from about 40 • at 1 eV to about 90 • at 0.5 eV. The experiment suggests that the lower minimum shifts slightly more than predicted, to about 100 • , so that the two minima are even closer together than predicted by theory and coalesce into a nearly flat section between 100 • [23]. The line with the shallower minima represents the calculation after convoluting the results with an angular resolution of 5 • (FWHM).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…By focusing the attention on the curve of the lowest density in Figure 1, we note that N is nearly constant at small fields. Then, it shows a maximum for a reduced field (E/N) max [30,31]. The RT minimum is located at an electron energy of RT ≈230-240 meV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%