1989
DOI: 10.1121/1.398439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of ambient seabed seismic levels below 1.0 Hz on the shallow eastern U.S. continental shelf

Abstract: Measurements of ambient seismic noise levels in the range 0.03–1.0 Hz were made using ocean-bottom seismometers (OBS) at four shallow-water (<100 m) locations on the New Jersey Shelf and George’s Bank. Surface gravity-wave-induced seabed motion (single-frequency microseism) was found to be dominant in the frequency range 0.03–0.3 Hz, with the high-frequency cutoff strongly dependent on water depth. The peak seismic level in the water wave band was measured at 2.0×10−8 (m/s2)2/Hz in 12 m of water. This l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Fig. 3(d) gives results that are comparable with those from more recent analyses (Trevorrow et al 1989), thus suggesting that the phenomenon of wave reflection along coastlines contributes significantly to the spectral distortions observed in the intermediate frequency range of the spectrum. However, it should be noted that the data and subsequent calculations in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, Fig. 3(d) gives results that are comparable with those from more recent analyses (Trevorrow et al 1989), thus suggesting that the phenomenon of wave reflection along coastlines contributes significantly to the spectral distortions observed in the intermediate frequency range of the spectrum. However, it should be noted that the data and subsequent calculations in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A relationship between the phenomena of wave reflection along the shoreline and microseisms is suggested by this study. In addition, the far‐field microseismic energy computed from this model is considerably larger than our two previous calculations (Darbyshire & Okeke 1969; Okeke 1972) and, interestingly, closer to that obtained from recent measurements (Trevorrow et al . 1989).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Surface wave‐induced seabed motion is common in the single‐frequency range of .05–.5 Hz (periods of 2–20 s), and is several orders of magnitude greater than the motion induced by seismic energy in the double‐frequency band [ Trevorrow et al , 1989]. A typical displacement caused by pressure variations under surface waves for the coastal seabed is on the order of 0.1 mm.…”
Section: Bottom Scourmentioning
confidence: 99%