2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021jd036086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Aerosol Size and Microphysical Properties: A Comparison Between Raman Lidar and Airborne Sensors

Abstract: This manuscript compares measurements of aerosol size distributions and microphysical properties retrieved from the Raman lidar BASIL with those obtained from a series of aircraft sensors during HyMeX‐SOP1. The attention is focused on a measurement session on 02 October 2012, with BASIL measurements revealing the presence of a lower aerosol layer extending up to 3.3 km and an elevated layer extending from 3.6 to 4.6 km. Aerosol size distribution and microphysical properties are determined from multi‐wavelength… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…inversions of spectral measurements of sky radiance and atmospheric transmittance from sunphotometers) or colocated in-situ data. [91][92][93][94][95][96]…”
Section: Aerosol Quantitative Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inversions of spectral measurements of sky radiance and atmospheric transmittance from sunphotometers) or colocated in-situ data. [91][92][93][94][95][96]…”
Section: Aerosol Quantitative Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground-based measurements, acquired using instrumentations deploying passive or active remote sensing techniques, have provided critical insight on aerosol-speciated intensive and extensive radiative properties [18][19][20][21][22][23]. Spaceborne observations, providing near-global coverage, have effectively overcome the spatial constraints of ground-based stations [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Passive sensors, such as the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), onboard Terra, and Aqua satellites, have supplied the scientific community with multi-year records of the columnar aerosol optical depth (AOD) since 2000 [31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is based on the computation of the derivative of the elastic lidar backscatter signal [6][7][8][9][10]; alternative approaches consider the elastic backscatter lidar signal variance or a threshold signal level [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Another effective approach to estimate the ABLH relies on the application of a Haar wavelet covariance transform to elastic backscatter lidar signals [18][19][20]. However, the application of the above-mentioned methodologies to the elastic backscatter lidar signals may produce false ABLH estimates in the presence of advection and local accumulation processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%