2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001jd000361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements and simulation of stratospheric NO3 at mid and high latitudes in the northern hemisphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be tricky to compare model calculations with highresolution in situ profiles and with remote-sensing observations integrating over tens of kilometres . For instance, discrepancies between remote-sensing observations and model calculations have been reported for stratospheric NO 3 in the case of localized temperature inhomogeneities as a result of the strong dependence of NO 3 cross sections and kinetics on temperature (Renard et al, 2001). N 2 O 5 and NO 2 may be subsequently impacted because NO 3 , together with NO 2 , plays a central role in the equilibrium reaction controlling N 2 O 5 in the gas phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be tricky to compare model calculations with highresolution in situ profiles and with remote-sensing observations integrating over tens of kilometres . For instance, discrepancies between remote-sensing observations and model calculations have been reported for stratospheric NO 3 in the case of localized temperature inhomogeneities as a result of the strong dependence of NO 3 cross sections and kinetics on temperature (Renard et al, 2001). N 2 O 5 and NO 2 may be subsequently impacted because NO 3 , together with NO 2 , plays a central role in the equilibrium reaction controlling N 2 O 5 in the gas phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, other measurements of atmospheric NO 3 column at low and midlatitudes at urban-influenced and remote ground-based sites have been made by using the Moon as a light source and employing differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) Jones, 1996a,b, 1998;Lal et al, 1993;Renard et al, 2001;Solomon et al, 1989). Also, vertical concentration profiles of NO 3 have been inferred from ground-based measurements by observing NO 3 in the slant column during sunrise with direct lunar, zenith sky, and off-axis methods Coe et al, 2002;Smith and Solomon, 1990;Smith et al, 1993;von Friedeburg et al, 2002;Weaver et al, 1996).…”
Section: M Chen Et Al: Diurnal Variation Of Midlatitudinal No 3 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between k 1 (T) calculated with the value of 2400°K and k 1 (T) calculated using the JPL recommended value (2450°K) is 23% which is within the JPL recommended uncertainties for k 1 (T) (30%). The new activation energy is still very close to the value of 2430°K derived by Renard et al [2001] but it is about 10% lower than the value of 2740°K found by Renard et al [2005] study. Note that, the comparison with this latter study is not as straightforward because their adjustment also led to a factor 4 enhancement of the pre-exponential factor of k 1 that is also called the Arrhenius A-factor.…”
Section: Minimization Of Temperature Retrieval Biasmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Several attempts have been made to estimate the rate constant of reaction (R1) from balloon-borne NO 3 measurements. Renard et al [2001] found the best agreement between balloon-borne measurements carried out during the 90 s and photochemical model calculations for a value of 2430°K for the activation energy (E/R, which is strictly speaking the ''activation temperature'') of reaction (R1). They have updated this work using more recent balloon observations carried out between October 1998 and September 2002 [Renard et al, 2005].…”
Section: Minimization Of Temperature Retrieval Biasmentioning
confidence: 83%