2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement uncertainty associated with chromatic confocal profilometry for 3D surface texture characterization of natural human enamel

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NCP used in this study had a live video screen of the surface with a horizontal indicator line to identify the optimum focus and position the scanner. The scans from the NCP were automatically analysed using a custom designed macro program based on previously published protocols from our research group to extract Sa roughness using a Gaussian cut-off filter of 25 μm [3,26,27]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NCP used in this study had a live video screen of the surface with a horizontal indicator line to identify the optimum focus and position the scanner. The scans from the NCP were automatically analysed using a custom designed macro program based on previously published protocols from our research group to extract Sa roughness using a Gaussian cut-off filter of 25 μm [3,26,27]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline values for natural enamel indicate a complex textured surface, which is supported by visual evidence from the confocal images, thereby the effect of roughness change value is partly determined by the baseline values and the variation within the sample micro-structure. Natural enamel became significantly smoother after erosion whilst polished enamel became rougher, following recent trends [15,24,27,33]. These differences in behaviour between the two surfaces cannot be attributed to the differences in measurement capabilities and remain true representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There has recently been increased interest in investigating surface changes of natural enamel surfaces which are a more clinically relevant substrate [14,15,31,32]. However, difficulties have been identified specific to optical devices, whereby measurement drop out occurs over curvatures with push the angular tolerance of the device [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations