2018
DOI: 10.1037/vio0000151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement tools to assess relationship abuse and sexual assault prevention program effectiveness among youth.

Abstract: Objective: This article describes the adaptation, development, and psychometric properties of survey instruments to assess outcomes of bystander-focused violence prevention efforts among high school students, including media literacy, rape myths, bystander readiness, bystander barriers and facilitators of bystander action, bystander intentions, perceptions of school personnel helping, perceptions of peer helping, and victim empathy. Method: The study was based on data collected from 3,172 high school student… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the work of Banyard and colleagues (Banyard et al, 2014) as a base as well as adaptations of this work for high school samples by Coker and colleagues (Coker et al, 2019), and validity was confirmed in other analyses using this data set (Banyard et al, 2021). We chose the specific bystander situations included by drawing upon recent work on high school students as bystanders to dating violence, sexual harassment and violence, and stalking (Edwards et al, 2017). Four questions asked students about behaviors in which sexual harassment or sexual violence was about to happen or had already happened (referred to as reactive bystander behavior or reactive actionism).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the work of Banyard and colleagues (Banyard et al, 2014) as a base as well as adaptations of this work for high school samples by Coker and colleagues (Coker et al, 2019), and validity was confirmed in other analyses using this data set (Banyard et al, 2021). We chose the specific bystander situations included by drawing upon recent work on high school students as bystanders to dating violence, sexual harassment and violence, and stalking (Edwards et al, 2017). Four questions asked students about behaviors in which sexual harassment or sexual violence was about to happen or had already happened (referred to as reactive bystander behavior or reactive actionism).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full study sample (including youth and adult surveys) was randomly split in half to allow for the computation of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) as done in previous research (Edwards, Banyard, et al, ). One half of the data was used to run exploratory factor analyses while the other half of the data was used to compute confirmatory factor analyses for the final sets of items for each scale using MPlus 8.0 statistical software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical models (Ajzen, 1991;Prochaska & DiClemente, 1984;Prochaska et al, 1992;Rogers, 2002;Rosenstock, 1974), in conjunction with previous etiological research, indicate key intermediary outcomes for bystander-focused prevention of interpersonal violence. These intermediary outcomes include knowledge, victim empathy (Ahrens & Campbell, 2000), rape myth acceptance, or the degree to which one accepts false beliefs about sexual assault perpetrators, and victims (McMahon & Farmer, 2011), and media literacy, or the degree to which youth notice harmful portrayals of relationships in the media (Edwards et al, 2018;Manganello, 2008). In addition, these intermediary outcomes include bystander barriers (Edwards et al, 2018) and bystander readiness, an awareness of the problem and the lack of denial about the problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These intermediary outcomes include knowledge, victim empathy (Ahrens & Campbell, 2000), rape myth acceptance, or the degree to which one accepts false beliefs about sexual assault perpetrators, and victims (McMahon & Farmer, 2011), and media literacy, or the degree to which youth notice harmful portrayals of relationships in the media (Edwards et al, 2018;Manganello, 2008). In addition, these intermediary outcomes include bystander barriers (Edwards et al, 2018) and bystander readiness, an awareness of the problem and the lack of denial about the problem. Bystander readiness is a key part of Latené and Darley's model of what helps bystanders take action (Banyard, 2008;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation