2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement structures of hope: A review of single-factor and two-factor models across hope scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy reflects the challenges in measuring EFs. The unidimensional model seems to better explain EFs at these ages (Karr et al, 2018;Rose, 2022). Several studies reported a factor structure to divide EFs into hot and cool (Goldstein & Naglieri, 2014;Zelazo, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This discrepancy reflects the challenges in measuring EFs. The unidimensional model seems to better explain EFs at these ages (Karr et al, 2018;Rose, 2022). Several studies reported a factor structure to divide EFs into hot and cool (Goldstein & Naglieri, 2014;Zelazo, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Specifically, ''agency thinking'' represents belief in the capacity to initiate and sustain actions to achieve a goal, while ''pathways thinking'' represents belief in the capacity to generate routes toward that goal. Hope theory (Snyder, 2002; for late reviews, see Edwards & McConnell, 2023;Ong et al, 2022;Rose, 2022) emphasizes that hope consists of a specific goal and sustained activity toward that goal. As mentioned previously, the theory of Pleasure and Pain (Diener, 1984) states that greater happiness stems from gaining goals or needs.…”
Section: Mediating Roles Of Hopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of hope suggests that people can achieve success by possessing cognitive abilities such as agency thinking and path thinking, which entail having the will to succeed and the perceived capacity to identify and pursue the path to success (Sedera et al, 2022;Rose, 2022). Alarcon et al (2013) found that hope is consistently associated with positive outcomes in areas such as academic and athletic performance, health, and psychological well-being.…”
Section: Hope and Task Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…H4: Human capital has a direct effect on work engagement 2.4. Hope and Work Engagement According to COR theory, resources are important inputs to work engagement, and hope is an important resource for generating both work engagement and task performance (Rose, 2022). High levels of Hope can lead to positive emotions, high expectations, and the belief that one has the necessary resources to succeed (Carton, 2018;Sedera et al, 2022).…”
Section: Human Capital and Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation