2021
DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-3181-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement report: Chemical characteristics of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during typical biomass burning season at an agricultural site of the North China Plain

Abstract: Abstract. Biomass burning activities are ubiquitous in China, especially in northern China, where there is a large rural population and winter heating custom. Biomass burning tracers (i.e., levoglucosan, mannosan and potassium (K+)), as well as other chemical components, were quantified at a rural site (Gucheng, GC) in northern China from 15 October to 30 November, during a transition heating season, when the field burning of agricultural residue was becoming intense. The measured daily average concentrations … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in areas where a significant cooking source is present, interference from BBOA is likely insignificant for COA quantification. Furthermore, at our study location, the campaign-average concentration of levoglucosan is 50 ng/m 3 , much lower than those measured in biomass burning influenced areas (e.g., 790 ng/m 3 during biomass burning season in North China Plain 62 ), and the f C2H4O2+ is around the background level, i.e., ∼0.3%, as reported by Cubison et al 63 This collective body of evidence indicates that BBOA contributed negligibly to the COA tracer ion (C 6 H 10 O + , m/z 98) identified in our study (Figure 5).…”
Section: Identification Of Cooking Organic Aerosol (Coa)contrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Therefore, in areas where a significant cooking source is present, interference from BBOA is likely insignificant for COA quantification. Furthermore, at our study location, the campaign-average concentration of levoglucosan is 50 ng/m 3 , much lower than those measured in biomass burning influenced areas (e.g., 790 ng/m 3 during biomass burning season in North China Plain 62 ), and the f C2H4O2+ is around the background level, i.e., ∼0.3%, as reported by Cubison et al 63 This collective body of evidence indicates that BBOA contributed negligibly to the COA tracer ion (C 6 H 10 O + , m/z 98) identified in our study (Figure 5).…”
Section: Identification Of Cooking Organic Aerosol (Coa)contrasting
confidence: 62%
“…(2019) evaluated the source contributions of ambient NH 3 from livestock breeding, fertilizer use, fossil fuel, and urban waste in Chinese Megacities. Biomass, a commonly used residential fuel in the NCP, can produce considerable amount of NH 3 under incomplete combustion conditions (Q. Li et al., 2016; Liang et al., 2021; H.‐W. Xiao et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the emission inventory of NH 3 also included biomass burning emissions (Liao et al, 2022;Yu et al, 2020). However, related studies on 15 N isotopes for the source apportionment of NH 3 /NH 4 + generally overlooked the contribution of biomass burning, leading to biased NH 4 + source contribution, especially in the NCP winter with intensive biomass burning activities (Liang et al, 2021). This is the first study to analyze the dynamic sources of NH 4 + in three haze episodes in the NCP based on high time resolution δ 15 N-NH 4 + .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BBOA in this study was possibly from (1) biofuel/biomass burning from domestic heating in the NCP (Duan et al, 2020;Huang et al, 2020;Elser et al, 2016); ( 2) The open biomass burning around observation site (Li et al, 2017a;Liang et al, 2021). It is indeed that biomass burning plumes from open fire burning were frequently seen during the campaign.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%