2011
DOI: 10.1002/macp.201100303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Protocols for Reporting PEDOT Thin Film Conductivity and Optical Transmission: A Critical Survey

Abstract: PEDOT is one of the most frequently studied conducting polymers in literature but values for optical transmission and electrical conductivity vary greatly. Therefore measurement protocols are examined and insights are suggested into why the protocols themselves may lead to differences. Reported PEDOT conductivity is the result of contact and non‐contact film thickness and four‐point probe measurements. The soft nature of PEDOT implies that any contact method must be executed with extreme care as values of cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 To estimate the reliability of R s measurements made with patterned ITO electrodes and two-point contacts, the R s values of the methanol-washed PEDOT films were also calculated using four-point probe measurements taken from the center of the film. Prior to the measurements, the polymer was carefully scraped from the edges of the PEDOT film to avoid PEDOT film contact with the ITO and resulting errors due to electrical conductance of ITO.…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 To estimate the reliability of R s measurements made with patterned ITO electrodes and two-point contacts, the R s values of the methanol-washed PEDOT films were also calculated using four-point probe measurements taken from the center of the film. Prior to the measurements, the polymer was carefully scraped from the edges of the PEDOT film to avoid PEDOT film contact with the ITO and resulting errors due to electrical conductance of ITO.…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably due to the fact that, in the approximation of a homogeneous dispersion of PEDOT into the EVALS matrix, the conductivity was calculated by taking into account the whole sample thickness ( d = 3.5 µm). Indeed, the maximum surface conductivity of the EVALS32–PEDOT ( σ s ∼ 0.056 S) was comparable or higher than those measured on PEDOT films obtained by EDOT VPP performed directly on the oxidant layer …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The ratio between the measured inner probe voltage ( V ) and the source DC current, passing through the outer probes ( I ), was directly given by a digital multimeter Keithley 2700 (four‐wire resistance mode). The conductivity of each sample was obtained according to the equation for thin films: σ=ln(2)IπVd where d is the thickness of the sample …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To make the antenna flexible and lightweight, a PEDOT thin film and sticky tape have been selected as the conductor and substrate respectively. PEDOT is a stable conductive polymers and can be produced using commercial formulations with lowcost manufacturing techniques such as spin or spray coating and screen or inkjet printing [10]. While DC conductivities exceeding 3×10 5 S/m have been reported in the literature [11] for sub-micron thick PEDOT films, it has been proven very challenging to simultaneously achieve sufficient thickness and satisfactory conductivity to satisfy the requirements for microwave antenna applications.…”
Section: Antenna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%