2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement properties of the Spanish version of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS) in cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) [ 14 ] is a widely used questionnaire in cancer patients [ 15 , 16 ] with a 4-item, and unidimensional outcome measure designed to capture to what extent an individual copes with stress in a resilient fashion [ 14 ]. Resilience has attracted the interest of the scientific community during the Covid-19 outbreak, as a protective factor in mental health.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) [ 14 ] is a widely used questionnaire in cancer patients [ 15 , 16 ] with a 4-item, and unidimensional outcome measure designed to capture to what extent an individual copes with stress in a resilient fashion [ 14 ]. Resilience has attracted the interest of the scientific community during the Covid-19 outbreak, as a protective factor in mental health.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with a high resilience trait showed less distress and symptoms compared to those with low coping capacity [ 17 ]. Reliability for scale was 0.86 in the Spanish sample [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the cross-validation study had been completed, the same analyses were all performed on the total sample. Given that the same factorial solution had been obtained in the first sub-sample with EFA and in the second sub-sample with CFA, we proceeded to analyze the total sample with the CFA of the previously selected factorial solution (following the recommendations of Calderon et al, 2022) to take advantage of all the information available in the data. Furthermore, a measurement invariance study by gender and across the age groups (emerging, established and middle adulthood) was carried out, using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) with the factor model selected previously (Jöreskog, 2005;Millsap & Yun-Tein, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors have been proposed as resources assumed to buffer the effects of events such as cancer diseases on QoL and mental health. The most relevant resource factors are sense of coherence ( Antonovsky, 1993 ; Asaba & Okawa, 2021 ), dispositional optimism ( Carver & Scheier, 2014 ; Forte et al, 2022 ), resilience ( Calderon et al, 2022 ; Lau, Khoo, Ho, & Tan, 2021 ; Luthar, Cicchetti, & Becker, 2000 ; Zhou, Ning, Wang, & Li, 2022 ), self-esteem ( Niveau, New, & Beaudoin, 2021 ), and self-efficacy ( Bandura, 1997 ; Banik et al, 2017 ). Multiple studies have consistently shown that these resource variables are associated with QoL ( Asaba & Okawa, 2021 ; Finck, Barradas, Zenger, & Hinz, 2018 ; Giglio, Rodriguez-Blazquez, Pedro-Cuesta, & Forjaz, 2015 ; Milbury, Tannir, & Cohen, 2011 ; Zenger, Brix, Borowski, Stolzenburg, & Hinz, 2010 ; Zhou et al, 2022 ), mental health ( Fischer, Cripe, & Rand, 2018 ; Plitzko, Mehnert-Theuerkauf, & Götze, 2020 ; Uchida et al, 2018 ), spiritual well-being ( Kavak, Özdemir, & Dural, 2021 ), and health behavior ( Thomas et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%