Measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

Wiertsema, Suzanne H.; Rietberg, Marc B.; Hekman, Karin M.C.; Schothorst, Maaike; Witte, Pieter Bas de; Steultjens, Martijn; Dekker, Joost

doi:10.1007/s00776-013-0517-8

Cited by 15 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The present study showed SEM of 100.1, which was lower than found by the Dutch and Norwegian versions, but higher than that obtained by the Italian version of WOSI with SEMs of 130.6, 122.4 and 71, respectively. 15 18 19 The current MDC was 277.5 and thus lower than found by the Dutch 19 and Norwegian 18 versions, but higher than the Italian version 15 corresponding to 362.0, 339.3 and 196.0, respectively. The lower SEM and its resulting MDC in the Italian study could be explained by the use of a test-retest period of only 3 days and use of narrower inclusion criteria (including only patients with primary dislocations).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 53%

“…For agreement evaluation, the present Bland-Altman plot indicated no systematic bias, which is in line with the findings of the Dutch study. 19 The only study to compare LOA with is the Norwegian version 18 with slightly wider LOAs compared with the present version (−339.9; 344.8 vs −246.4; 308.6), which, again, could be due to variance in study populations (eg, occult SI such as superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions in the Norwegian study versus surgically treated SI in the current study).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

“… 15 These actions may have generated a more homogenous study group with limited subject variation resulting in smaller SD affecting MDC positively. Differences could also be due to the various ways of calculating SEM 31 with the Norwegian study 18 calculating SEM as agreement (individual level), whereas the Dutch, 19 Italian 15 and present study calculating SEM consistency (group level). Briefly, SEM agreement takes the systematic differences between test one and two into account (eg, systematic differences between clinicians and their objective measurements), whereas SEM consistency omits these differences.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Translation, adaptation and measurement properties of an electronic version of the Danish Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo translate and adapt the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) questionnaire into Danish and, to evaluate measurement properties of an electronic Danish WOSI version.MethodsThe Swedish WOSI version was used for translation and adaptation into Danish followed by examination of test-retest reproducibility (14-day interval) besides concurrent and construct validity. Concurrent validity was examined by comparing WOSI in paper version with an electronic version, whereas construct validity was examined by comparing WOSI with Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Reproducibility was evaluated with Intraclass correlations (ICC), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and limits of agreement (LOA). Validity was evaluated with Pearson’s (r) and Concordance Correlation Coefficients (CCC).Results41 subjects (median age 34, range 18–57) were included in the analysis of reproducibility. An ICC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99) for the total WOSI score was found. SEM was 100.1, resulting in an MDC of 277.5 and LOAs within the range of -246.4 and 308.6. 25 subjects (median age 34, range 18–72) were included in the analysis of concurrent validity obtaining a CCC of 0.96 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.98). Construct validity was investigated in 62 subjects (median age 31, range 18–72) obtaining correlations of 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.97) (NPRS) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.94) (OSS).ConclusionsAn electronic Danish version of WOSI presented excellent test-retest reproducibility and acceptable measurement errors. Also, concurrent validity between paper and electronic version was highly satisfactory as was the construct validity. Surprisingly, though, the NPRS correlated more with WOSI than OSS.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 53%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Translation, adaptation and measurement properties of an electronic version of the Danish Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, when analyzing the four different domains of WOSI-PT, the Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.77 to 0.93, confirming the good consistency of each domain of the scale. In examining the internal consistency of WOSI validated for other countries, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91 in the Turkish version, 3 0.92 in the Dutch version, 22 and 0.95 in the Sweden version 12 were found.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the European Portuguese Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

Torres¹,

Faria²,

Cavalheiro³

et al. 2022

Acta Med Port

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) is a self-administered questionnaire specifically used to determine the impact of shoulder instability on quality of life. The aim of this study was to translate the WOSI into European Portuguese and analyze its validity and reliability in a population with shoulder instability.Material and Methods: The WOSI was translated and culturally adapted from its original version into European Portuguese (WOSIPT). Internal consistency and test-retest analyses were conducted to determine the level of reliability of the scale. WOSI-PT, Quick-DASH, and SF-12 questionnaires were applied to 81 patients with symptomatic shoulder instability to assess validity, and reliability was tested by randomly selecting 50 patients within 72 hours using a test-retest design.Results: The reliability of the WOSI-PT was very high, with Cronbach´s alpha equal to 0.97 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98. Regarding the construct validity, the correlation between the WOSI-PT and QuickDASH was high and negative (-0.79). The correlations between WOSI-PT and SF-12 were positive, respectively, moderate with physical (0.66) and low with mental (0.34) health.Conclusion: WOSI-PT is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the functional impact of shoulder joint instability on quality of life.

show abstract

“…WOSI covers four domains (physical symptoms, sport/recreation/work, lifestyle, and emotions) comprising 21 items. Each item is scored on a 0-100point visual analogue scale 9 with a total score of which can be converted into a percentage (with 0% as the level of no trouble; 100% most trouble) 49 .…”

Section: Subjectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Subacromial space outlet in female patients with multidirectional instability based on hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder measured by ultrasound

Kjær

Wandele

Spanhove

et al. 2020

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the study was to compare the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) between patients diagnosed with hypermobility type of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) or Hypermobility 2 Spectrum Disorder (HSD) and healthy controls by evaluating the relative amount the tendon occupies in the subacromial area. Furthermore, the aim was to evaluate if there was a change in AHD with arm elevation within and between groups. MethodsTwenty-nine female hEDS/HSD patients (age 34 ± 12.9 years) and twenty healthy controls (age 33 ± 10.8 years) participated in the study. The supraspinatus tendon (SST) thickness and AHD were measured using ultrasound (US). The interplay between the SST and the AHD was expressed as the

show abstract

Measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

Cited by 15 publications

References 27 publications

Translation, adaptation and measurement properties of an electronic version of the Danish Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

Translation, adaptation and measurement properties of an electronic version of the Danish Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the European Portuguese Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

Subacromial space outlet in female patients with multidirectional instability based on hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder measured by ultrasound

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About