2017
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese Version of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire

Abstract: NA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
15
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…So, although the LSIQ is promising and can be of some importance if can predict graded activity or motor control exercise, we cannot oversell its importance at this stage until further evidence shows otherwise. 36 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, although the LSIQ is promising and can be of some importance if can predict graded activity or motor control exercise, we cannot oversell its importance at this stage until further evidence shows otherwise. 36 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screening tool questions are presented in Table 1 . It has undergone cross-cultural translation 13 , 14 and its reliability has been tested. 13 – 15 Briefly, the questionnaire comprises 14 items related to how the patient feels and his or her behavior, activity, and positions adopted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 Lumbar instability signs were subsequently used in later studies by other investigators as inclusion criteria for patients with lumbar instability 10 , 11 and for monitoring the effect of exercise intervention on these patients. 12 Subsequently, the questionnaire was translated into Thai and Brazilian Portuguese 13 , 14 and its reliability tested. 13 – 15 Chatprem et al 13 (in press) developed a Thai version of the lumbar instability screening tool for physical therapists to administer to patients with CLBP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 It has face validity, good internal consistency and 22 moderate to high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.75). 77 78 A recently published Rasch analysis demonstrated the questionnaire to be unidimensional. 78 The measure has not been validated against any objective measure of 'instability', and there is discussion whether this questionnaire reflects other mechanisms, such as underlying physiological pain mechanism.…”
Section: Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect modification analysis will be conducted for the primary outcome and secondary outcomes separately. Linear mixed models with terms for participants (fixed), treatment group, treatment group×time (for the effectiveness analysis), predictor (potential effect modifier such as LSIQ), treatment group×predictor (for the effect modification analysis), 77 physiotherapists, treatment group×physiotherapists and baseline score for the dependent variable will be constructed. A prespecified threshold of 15 units will be used for a clinically important interaction effect.…”
Section: Treatment Effectiveness and Effect Modification Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%