1998
DOI: 10.2514/2.429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Three-Dimensional Crossflow Separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational C p coefficients agree with the measurements very well although they are a little weaker at the second minimum, where ≈ 160 • , than those of experiments [2,3]; the second minimum of C p on Grid B is even weaker than that of Grid A. It is very difficult to predict the C f , because the transition in the 3-D separation flows is very complex.…”
Section: Effect On Gridssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The computational C p coefficients agree with the measurements very well although they are a little weaker at the second minimum, where ≈ 160 • , than those of experiments [2,3]; the second minimum of C p on Grid B is even weaker than that of Grid A. It is very difficult to predict the C f , because the transition in the 3-D separation flows is very complex.…”
Section: Effect On Gridssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The flow transition includes not only the streamwise Tollmien-Schilichting (T-S) wave instability but also crossflow instability, which is lack of effective predictive tools with the transition models until now. The flows around prolate spheroid have been studied both experimentally [1][2][3] and computationally using Reynolds-averaged NavierStokes (RANS) with k-ε model of Tsi and Whiteney [4], detached eddy simulation (DES, [5]) based on S-A [6] model of Constantinescu et al [7], large-eddy simulation (LES) of Wikström et al [8] and so on. Deng and Zhuang [9] applied a novel Slightly Compressible Model (SCM) to predict the flows at a relative little AOA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetzel et al [28] compares experimental methods for identifying the crossflow separation line. Many of these approaches are relevant for interrogation of RANS data sets.…”
Section: Separation Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the computation will be compared with the experimental data available in the literature [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The 6:1 prolate spheroid used for the measurements is 1.37 m long and the Reynolds number based on the spheroid length is 4.20?10 6 .…”
Section: Summary Of Prolate Spheroid Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%