The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01589702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of thee + e −→π + π − π 0 ande + e −→ωπ + π − reactions in the energy interval 1350–2400 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…III it is clear that the cross section of the process e þ e À ! þ À 0 obtained by BABAR (Aubert et al, 2004b) is consistent with that of SND (Achasov et al, 2002) below ffiffi ffi s p ¼ 1:4 GeV, but is much higher than that at DM2 (Antonelli et al, 1992) above this energy. The energy dependence of the cross section observed by DM2 is also inconsistent with other measurements [see the discussion of this problem by Achasov et al (2002)] and the existence of the rather well-established !ð1420Þ and !ð1650Þ resonances.…”
Section: Some Implications For Theory and Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…III it is clear that the cross section of the process e þ e À ! þ À 0 obtained by BABAR (Aubert et al, 2004b) is consistent with that of SND (Achasov et al, 2002) below ffiffi ffi s p ¼ 1:4 GeV, but is much higher than that at DM2 (Antonelli et al, 1992) above this energy. The energy dependence of the cross section observed by DM2 is also inconsistent with other measurements [see the discussion of this problem by Achasov et al (2002)] and the existence of the rather well-established !ð1420Þ and !ð1650Þ resonances.…”
Section: Some Implications For Theory and Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…23). The cross section below 1.4 GeV is in agreement with the SND measurement (Achasov et al, 2002), but at higher energies a large deviation from the DM2 results (Antonelli et al, 1992) is observed. The cross section in this region is fitted (see the inset in Fig.…”
Section: A Overviewsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations