1984
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(84)91701-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the total cross section for 235U and 238U photofission in the δ-resonance region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 c); the full line is the result of the Monte Carlo calculation by Lepr~tre et al [5]. Experimental data are as follows: EJ, Bellini et al [23]; o, Bellini et al [4]; o, Lepr~tre et al [5]; o, Moretto et al [24]; o, Ivanov et al [7]; v, Ahrens et al [3]; a, Minarik and Novikov [20]; o, Bernabei et al [6]; m, Martins et al [8]; A, Tavares et al [9]; ..... , Arruda-Neto et al [25] 415 mean value of 16 • 2 rob, in good agreement with Monte Carlo calculations at energies up to 75 MeV (solid curve from [5]). For photon energies beyond ,-,60MeV, the result of the present calculation (dashed curve) agrees quite well with that reported in [5], although marked differences there exist at the lower energies.…”
Section: Results and Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 c); the full line is the result of the Monte Carlo calculation by Lepr~tre et al [5]. Experimental data are as follows: EJ, Bellini et al [23]; o, Bellini et al [4]; o, Lepr~tre et al [5]; o, Moretto et al [24]; o, Ivanov et al [7]; v, Ahrens et al [3]; a, Minarik and Novikov [20]; o, Bernabei et al [6]; m, Martins et al [8]; A, Tavares et al [9]; ..... , Arruda-Neto et al [25] 415 mean value of 16 • 2 rob, in good agreement with Monte Carlo calculations at energies up to 75 MeV (solid curve from [5]). For photon energies beyond ,-,60MeV, the result of the present calculation (dashed curve) agrees quite well with that reported in [5], although marked differences there exist at the lower energies.…”
Section: Results and Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a considerable number of measured photofission cross section data has been accumulated from bremsstrahlung- [18][19][20][21][22][23], electron- [24][25][26][27], and monochromatic photon-induced [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] fission experiments, we thought it worthwhile to perform a detailed analysis of these data by evaluating the fission cross section, ~r s, as a function of energy from the referred current photofission model, and to compare it with the experimental results. Two representative target nuclei have been thus selected for the purposes of the present analysis, namely 2~ and 238U.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 we show the calculated results, solid, dashed and dot-dash lines, compared to experimental points from Ref. [19] for uranium and lead nuclei. The dash-dot line is obtained using a free pion propagator, in which case we observe that the isobar becomes too narrow to describe the width of the measured data, even with included smearing due to Fermi motion of the nucleons.…”
Section: Nuclear Photoabsorption In the Isobar Regionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For all complex nuclei A > 6 a resonance-like cross section has been observed. The surprising result, however, is the scaling of the cross section with the atomic number A; the quantity (or-r, T / A) being described by a "Universal Curve" (equal shapes, mean energies and magnitude) [6,7,12]. The observed widths are larger than in the case of the proton as expected due to the Fermi motion and AN ~ NN coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…can be investigated by measuring fission fragment mass distributions, since the fragment mass split (symmetric versus asymmetric fission) is highly sensitive to the excitation energy of the residual fissioning system. quanta, tagged photons) [10,11,12]. For all complex nuclei A > 6 a resonance-like cross section has been observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%