Measurement of the total cross section differenceΔσ L innp transmission at 1.19, 2.49 and 3.65 GeV

Adiasevich, B. P.; Antonenko, V.; Averichev, S.A.; Azhgirey, L. S.; Ball, J.; Bazhanov, N. A.; Benda, B.; Borisov, N. S.; Borzunov, Yu.T.; Bunyatova, E. I.; Burinov, V. F.; Chernykh, E.V.; Dolgii, S. A.; Durand, G.; Dzyubak, O. P.; Федоров, А. Н.; Fimushkin, V. V.; Fontaine, J.M.; Glagolev, V. V.; Golovanov, L.B.; Grosnick, D.; Gurevich, G. M.; Hill, D.; Karpunin, A. V.; Kasprzyk, T.; Khachaturov, B.; Kirillov, A.D.; Kochelev, N.I.; Kovalenko, A. D.; Ковалев, А. И.; Kulikov, M. V.; Ladygin, V. P.; Lazarev, A. B.; Lehar, F.; Lesquen, A. de; Liburg, M.Yu.; Lopiano, D.; Lukhanin, A.A.; Maniakov, P. K.; Matafonov, V.N.; Matyushevsky, E.A.; Mgebrishvili, G.; Миронов, С. В.; Neganov, A. B.; Nikolaevsky, G. P.; Nomofilov, A.A.; Pilipenko, Yu.K.; Pisarev, I. L.; Пискунов, Н. М.; Plis, Yu. A.; Polunin, Yu. P.; Polyakov, V. V.; Prokofiev, A. N.; Ronzhin, D.A.; Rukoyatkin, P.; Sans, Jordi; Sharov, V.I.; Shilov, S. N.; Shishov, Yu.A.; Shutov, V.; Sorokin, P.; Spinka, H.; Starikov, A.Yu.; Stoletov, G.D.; Strokovsky, E. A.; Strunov, L.N.; Svetov, A. L.; Teterin, V. V.; Topalov, S. V.; Trautman, V. Yu.; Tsvinev, A.P.; Usov, Yu. A.; Vikhrov, V.; Volkov, V. I.; Yershov, A. A.; Yershov, V. P.; Zaporozhets, S.; Zhdanov, A. A.

doi:10.1007/s002880050148

Cited by 16 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1. One can see that the new results smoothly connect with the lower energy data and confirm a fast decrease to zero within a 1.2-2.0 GeV energy region, observed previously [7][8][9][10].…”

Section: The A~'lt(np) Observablessupporting

confidence: 89%

“…Total errors are the quadratic sums of experimental and systematic uncertainties. The results of our earlier measurements [7][8][9][10] together with the existing AaL(np) data [4], obtained with free polarized neutrons at lower energies, are also shown in Fig. 1.…”

Section: The A~'lt(np) Observablesmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…The measurements of energy dependences of the np total cross sections differences AaL(np) and Aaw(np) for parallel and antiparallel particle spins oriented longitudinally or transverse were proposed [5,6] at the beginning of the 90 th and started [7][8][9][10] in Dubna. To implement the proposed Aaa,T(np) experimental program, a large Argonne-Saclay polarized proton target (PPT) was reconstructed in Dubna [11][12][13], and a new polarized neutron beam line with suitable parameters [14,15] was constructed and tested.…”

Section: The A~'lt(np) Observablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two successful data taking runs were carried out in 1995 and 1997. The energy dependence of A~L(np) was measured at 1.19, 1.59, 1.79, 2.2, 2.49, and 3.66GeV [7][8][9][10].…”

Section: The A~'lt(np) Observablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Measurements of energy behaviour of spin-dependentnp—observables over 1.2–3.7 GeV energy region Dubna “Delta-Sigma” Experiment

Sharov¹,

Anischenko²,

Antonenko

et al. 2005

Czech J Phys

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1. One can see that the new results smoothly connect with the lower energy data and confirm a fast decrease to zero within a 1.2-2.0 GeV energy region, observed previously [7][8][9][10].…”

Section: The A~'lt(np) Observablessupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: The A~'lt(np) Observablesmentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: The A~'lt(np) Observablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two successful data taking runs were carried out in 1995 and 1997. The energy dependence of A~L(np) was measured at 1.19, 1.59, 1.79, 2.2, 2.49, and 3.66GeV [7][8][9][10].…”

Section: The A~'lt(np) Observablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Measurements of energy behaviour of spin-dependentnp—observables over 1.2–3.7 GeV energy region Dubna “Delta-Sigma” Experiment

Sharov¹,

Anischenko²,

Antonenko

et al. 2005

Czech J Phys

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The pole fit displays a rapid energy variation which would require a fine energy binning and measurements spanning the width of the COSY dibaryon. [26,27] shown as blue filled circles, PSI data [28] shown as black open circles, PPA data [29] shown as magenta open triangles, BNL data [30] shown as green filled triangles, and JINR data [31] shown as red open sqares], ∆σT (middle panel) [PSI data [32] shown as black open circles and SACLAY data [33][34][35] shown as magenta crosses], and ∆σL (right panel) [PSI data [32] shown as black open circles, LAMPF data [36] shown as blue filled circles, Saclay data [33] shown as magenta crosses, and JINR data [31,37] shown as red open squares]. Notation for SAID curves as in Fig.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitivity of the COSY dibaryon candidate tonpelastic scattering measurements

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The case for a dibaryon resonance, appearing in np scattering, has support from a WASA-at-COSY measurement of the polarization quantity Ay over a center-of-mass energy region suggested by structures seen earlier in two-pion production experiments. Here we compare fits with and without an associated pole in order to clarify the impact of these COSY data. We then consider what further np scattering measurements would most clearly distinguish between the pole and nonpole fit results.

show abstract

Frozen spin solid targets developed at the Laboratory of Nuclear Problems (JINR, Dubna)

et al. 2000

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experience with polarized targets and achieving of very low temperatures gave rise to the idea of using a new technique based on dissolving 3He in 4He to create a frozen spin polarized target. The short history of the development of such proton and deuteron targets at the Laboratory of Nuclear Problems (LNP) JINR is given. Kecently, the Saclay-Argonne frozen spin proton polarized target used initially in E704 experiment at FERMILAB was upgraded with adding the missing parts and the first physics experiments was carried out.

show abstract

Measurement of the total cross section differenceΔσ L innp transmission at 1.19, 2.49 and 3.65 GeV

Cited by 16 publications

References 37 publications

Measurements of energy behaviour of spin-dependentnp—observables over 1.2–3.7 GeV energy region Dubna “Delta-Sigma” Experiment

Measurements of energy behaviour of spin-dependentnp—observables over 1.2–3.7 GeV energy region Dubna “Delta-Sigma” Experiment

Sensitivity of the COSY dibaryon candidate tonpelastic scattering measurements

Frozen spin solid targets developed at the Laboratory of Nuclear Problems (JINR, Dubna)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About