1992
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(92)90577-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the slope of the π0 electromagnetic form factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
25
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[32]). This number is not very far from the central values of two last experiments, a π = 0.026 ± 0.024 ± 0.0048 [39], a π = 0.025 ± 0.014 ± 0.026 [40], but the experimental errors are rather large. An earlier experiment [41] produced a π = −0.11 ± 0.03 ± 0.08, a result whose central value has opposite sign and much larger absolute magnitude.…”
Section: B Anomalous Form Factormentioning
confidence: 65%
“…[32]). This number is not very far from the central values of two last experiments, a π = 0.026 ± 0.024 ± 0.0048 [39], a π = 0.025 ± 0.014 ± 0.026 [40], but the experimental errors are rather large. An earlier experiment [41] produced a π = −0.11 ± 0.03 ± 0.08, a result whose central value has opposite sign and much larger absolute magnitude.…”
Section: B Anomalous Form Factormentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The Dalitz decay of the TT° has been well studied experimentally [8] as well as theoretically [9]. For KDQ\ decays and other decay modes under investigation, i.e., K ee , K + -• 7r + 7r°, n° -> e + e~e + e~ (i^DDai), and direct K+ -• 7r + e+e~ (Knee), the observed final state charged particles are the same.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The π 0 γ * γ * form factor has been studied previously in the decay π 0 → e + e − γ [9,10,11], where the quantity of interest has been the slope parameter a of the first-order Taylor expansion f (x, 0) = 1+ax, with x ≡ m 2 e + e − /M 2 π 0 . Here we use a form factor parametrizaton based on the model of D'Ambrosio, Isidori, and Portolés (DIP) [12], but with an additional constraint that ensures the coupling vanishes at large momenta [13].…”
Section: Arxiv:08022064v2 [Hep-ex] 11 May 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%