2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2009.12.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the response of the ATLAS liquid argon barrel calorimeter to electrons at the 2004 combined test-beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
51
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cluster energy and position needs to be determined precisely starting from the visible energy deposited in the cells and taking into account the shower development in the sampling calorimeters, the energy deposited upstream the calorimeter (using information from the presampler), the leakage outside the calorimeters and the modulations of the energy in η and φ due to the accordion geometry. These factors and the calibration constants for the electronics (including corrections for known high voltage problems) have been derived and validated using electron and muon test beams and Monte Carlo simulation [65,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76]. The systematic uncertainty on the electron energy scale after this calibration procedure amounts to 3%.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Calorimetersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The cluster energy and position needs to be determined precisely starting from the visible energy deposited in the cells and taking into account the shower development in the sampling calorimeters, the energy deposited upstream the calorimeter (using information from the presampler), the leakage outside the calorimeters and the modulations of the energy in η and φ due to the accordion geometry. These factors and the calibration constants for the electronics (including corrections for known high voltage problems) have been derived and validated using electron and muon test beams and Monte Carlo simulation [65,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76]. The systematic uncertainty on the electron energy scale after this calibration procedure amounts to 3%.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Calorimetersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The difference in the electromagnetic scale between the test-beam setup and the full ATLAS detector due to the uncertainty in the liquid argon temperature in the test-beam, derived from comparison of different test-beam measurements [65,72];…”
Section: Electromagnetic Calorimetersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations