The bound states of 3 H and 3 He have been calculated using the Argonne v18 plus the Urbana threenucleon potential. The isospin T = 3/2 state have been included in the calculations as well as the n-p mass difference. The 3 H-3 He mass difference has been evaluated through the charge dependent terms explicitly included in the two-body potential. The calculations have been performed using two different methods: the solution of the Faddeev equations in momentum space and the expansion on the correlated hyperspherical harmonic basis. The results are in agreement within 0.1% and can be used as benchmark tests. Results for the CD-Bonn interaction are also presented. It is shown that the 3 H and 3 He binding energy difference can be predicted model independently.In the last years great efforts have been made to improve the description of the nucleon-nucleon (N N ) interaction. A new generation of potentials including explicitly charge independence and charge symmetry breaking (CIB,CSB) terms appeared. These interactions describe the N N scattering data below T lab = 300 MeV with a nearly perfect χ 2 /datum≈ 1. The CD-Bonn [1] and Argonne v 18 (AV18) [2] interactions also provide a neutron-neutron (nn) force, which has been adjusted to the experimental nn scattering length, whereas the Nijmegen interactions [3] are fitted only to proton-proton and proton-neutron data. Recently, the CD-Bonn potential has been updated to CD-Bonn 2000 [4]. In this paper we only present results for the AV18 and CD-Bonn 2000 interactions. Both are quite different from each other in their functional form, but their description of the N N data is almost equally accurate. Therefore a comparison of the results will give insights into the model dependence of our understanding of the three-nucleon (3N ) bound states.Following for example the notation of Ref.[2], all these N N potentials can be put in the general formThe short range part v R (N N ) of all of these interactions includes a certain number of parameters (around 40), which are determined by a fitting procedure to the N N scattering data and the deuteron binding energy (BE), whereas the long range part is represented by the one-pion-exchange potential v π (N N ) and an electromagnetic part v EM (N N ). For AV18, v EM (pp) consists of the one-and twophoton Coulomb terms plus the Darwin-Foldy term, vacuum polarization and magnetic moment interactions. The v EM (np) interaction includes a Coulomb term due to the neutron charge distribution in addition to the magnetic moment interaction. Finally, v EM (nn) is given by the magnetic moment interaction only. All these terms take into account the finite size of the nucleon charge distributions. The v EM (N N ) for CD-Bonn is much simpler:is given by the Coulomb force of point protons, whereas v EM (np) = v EM (nn) = 0. As it is well known, when these interactions are used to describe the 3N bound state, an underbinding of about 0.5 MeV to 0.9 MeV depending on the model is obtained (see for example Ref. [5]). The local potentials lead to less bin...