2010
DOI: 10.2172/1151630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Muon Neutrino Inclusive Charged Current Cross Section on Iron using the MINOS Detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluxes can be predicted using detailed beamline simulations benchmarked with an array of external hadron production data [3,10,11], constrained using in situ tertiary muon production measurements [12], or measured using well-understood processes such as neutrino-electron scattering [13]. Because the flux is the largest uncertainty in most cross section measurements, constraining the flux using multiple independent techniques is important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluxes can be predicted using detailed beamline simulations benchmarked with an array of external hadron production data [3,10,11], constrained using in situ tertiary muon production measurements [12], or measured using well-understood processes such as neutrino-electron scattering [13]. Because the flux is the largest uncertainty in most cross section measurements, constraining the flux using multiple independent techniques is important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each muon monitor comprises a 9 × 9 array of 10.2×10.2 m 2 ionization champers distributed uniformly inside 9 tubes [97].…”
Section: Muon Monitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggestion to use a kNN was inspired by work on the charged-current PID, and the technique showed promise in initial investigations [138].…”
Section: The Knn Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%