The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.94.025803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of theErc.m.=259 keV resonance in theN

Abstract: The14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction regulates the power generated by the CN cycle and thus impacts the structure and evolution of every star at some point in its life. The lowest positive-energy resonance in this reaction is located at E c.m. r = 259 keV, too high in energy to strongly influence quiescent stellar burning. However, the strength of this resonance is used as a cross-section normalization for lower-energy measurements of this reaction. We report on new measurements of the energy, strength and γ-ray branch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(137 reference statements)
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we take into account the total uncertainties, the new result for the E p = 278 keV resonance strength is in good agreement with the adopted values recommended by the Solar Fusion II compilation [5] as well as by the more recent work of Daigle et al [6] (see Table I). We do not quote here a new recommended value; we just note that considering our new value determined with an independent technique, the strength recommended by the Solar Fusion II compilation [5] and especially its somewhat higher uncertainty seems more appropriate than the value of Daigle et al [6] with its very small error bar. The results of those experiments where the E p = 278 keV resonance is used as a normalization point do not change by the present result.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If we take into account the total uncertainties, the new result for the E p = 278 keV resonance strength is in good agreement with the adopted values recommended by the Solar Fusion II compilation [5] as well as by the more recent work of Daigle et al [6] (see Table I). We do not quote here a new recommended value; we just note that considering our new value determined with an independent technique, the strength recommended by the Solar Fusion II compilation [5] and especially its somewhat higher uncertainty seems more appropriate than the value of Daigle et al [6] with its very small error bar. The results of those experiments where the E p = 278 keV resonance is used as a normalization point do not change by the present result.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[5] but its uncertainty is reduced to 2.4%. This uncertainty seems surprisingly low considering on one hand the stopping power uncertainty which is common to almost all the experiments and on the other hand the difficulty in characterizing the implanted targets used by Daigle et al [6].…”
Section: A the Importance Of The E P = 278 Kev Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Its S-factor curve is essentially flat over a wide energy range [18], indicating a dominance of direct capture and capture through very wide resonances. Indeed, the 6.79 MeV transition plays only a secondary role for the low-energy resonance at E = 259 keV [27,28], which has recently emerged as a precise normalization point [17,25,26,33,34]. The transition has not even been detected in the subsequent resonance at E = 987 keV [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%