Abstract:The14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction regulates the power generated by the CN cycle and thus impacts the structure and evolution of every star at some point in its life. The lowest positive-energy resonance in this reaction is located at E c.m. r = 259 keV, too high in energy to strongly influence quiescent stellar burning. However, the strength of this resonance is used as a cross-section normalization for lower-energy measurements of this reaction. We report on new measurements of the energy, strength and γ-ray branch… Show more
“…If we take into account the total uncertainties, the new result for the E p = 278 keV resonance strength is in good agreement with the adopted values recommended by the Solar Fusion II compilation [5] as well as by the more recent work of Daigle et al [6] (see Table I). We do not quote here a new recommended value; we just note that considering our new value determined with an independent technique, the strength recommended by the Solar Fusion II compilation [5] and especially its somewhat higher uncertainty seems more appropriate than the value of Daigle et al [6] with its very small error bar. The results of those experiments where the E p = 278 keV resonance is used as a normalization point do not change by the present result.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[5] but its uncertainty is reduced to 2.4%. This uncertainty seems surprisingly low considering on one hand the stopping power uncertainty which is common to almost all the experiments and on the other hand the difficulty in characterizing the implanted targets used by Daigle et al [6].…”
Section: A the Importance Of The E P = 278 Kev Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on several measurements, the recommended value of the strength has an uncertainty of 4.6%, as given by the latest compilation of solar fusion reactions [5]. In the paper of Daigle et al [6] published after the above cited compilation, a new result was presented and the literature data were also critically re-analyzed. Their recommended value is in agreement with that of Ref.…”
Section: A the Importance Of The E P = 278 Kev Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low energies the 14 N(p, γ ) 15 O reaction proceeds mostly through the direct capture mechanism with contribution from Woodbury et al [9] 1949 activation 10 Duncan and Perry [10] 1951 activation 20 Bashkin et al [11] 1955 prompt γ 13 ± 3 Hebbard et al [12] 1963 prompt γ 14 ± 2 Becker et al [13] 1982 prompt γ 14 ± 1 Runkle et al [14] 2005 prompt γ 13.5 ± 1.2 Imbriani et al [15] 2005 prompt γ 12.9 ± 0.9 Bemmerer et al [16] 2006 prompt γ 12.8 ± 0.6 Daigle et al [6] 2016 prompt γ 12.6 ± 0.6…”
Background: The 14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction plays a vital role in various astrophysical scenarios. Its reaction rate must be accurately known in the present era of high precision astrophysics. The cross section of the reaction is often measured relative to a low energy resonance, the strength of which must therefore be determined precisely. Purpose: The activation method, based on the measurement of 15 O decay, has not been used in modern measurements of the 14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction. The aim of the present work is to provide strength data for two resonances in the 14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction using the activation method. The obtained values are largely independent from previous data measured by in-beam γ spectroscopy and are free from some of their systematic uncertainties. Method: Solid state TiN targets were irradiated with a proton beam provided by the Tandetron accelerator of Atomki using a cyclic activation. The decay of the produced 15 O isotopes was measured by detecting the 511 keV positron annihilation γ rays. Results: The strength of the E p = 278 keV resonance was measured to be ωγ 278 = (13.4 ± 0.8) meV while for the E p = 1058 keV resonance ωγ 1058 = (442 ± 27) meV. Conclusions: The obtained E p = 278 keV resonance strength is in fair agreement with the values recommended by two recent works. However, the E p = 1058 keV resonance strength is about 20% higher than the previous value. The discrepancy may be caused in part by a previously neglected finite target thickness correction. As only the low energy resonance is used as a normalization point for cross section measurements, the calculated astrophysical reaction rate of the 14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction and therefore the astrophysical consequences are not changed by the present results.
“…If we take into account the total uncertainties, the new result for the E p = 278 keV resonance strength is in good agreement with the adopted values recommended by the Solar Fusion II compilation [5] as well as by the more recent work of Daigle et al [6] (see Table I). We do not quote here a new recommended value; we just note that considering our new value determined with an independent technique, the strength recommended by the Solar Fusion II compilation [5] and especially its somewhat higher uncertainty seems more appropriate than the value of Daigle et al [6] with its very small error bar. The results of those experiments where the E p = 278 keV resonance is used as a normalization point do not change by the present result.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[5] but its uncertainty is reduced to 2.4%. This uncertainty seems surprisingly low considering on one hand the stopping power uncertainty which is common to almost all the experiments and on the other hand the difficulty in characterizing the implanted targets used by Daigle et al [6].…”
Section: A the Importance Of The E P = 278 Kev Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on several measurements, the recommended value of the strength has an uncertainty of 4.6%, as given by the latest compilation of solar fusion reactions [5]. In the paper of Daigle et al [6] published after the above cited compilation, a new result was presented and the literature data were also critically re-analyzed. Their recommended value is in agreement with that of Ref.…”
Section: A the Importance Of The E P = 278 Kev Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low energies the 14 N(p, γ ) 15 O reaction proceeds mostly through the direct capture mechanism with contribution from Woodbury et al [9] 1949 activation 10 Duncan and Perry [10] 1951 activation 20 Bashkin et al [11] 1955 prompt γ 13 ± 3 Hebbard et al [12] 1963 prompt γ 14 ± 2 Becker et al [13] 1982 prompt γ 14 ± 1 Runkle et al [14] 2005 prompt γ 13.5 ± 1.2 Imbriani et al [15] 2005 prompt γ 12.9 ± 0.9 Bemmerer et al [16] 2006 prompt γ 12.8 ± 0.6 Daigle et al [6] 2016 prompt γ 12.6 ± 0.6…”
Background: The 14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction plays a vital role in various astrophysical scenarios. Its reaction rate must be accurately known in the present era of high precision astrophysics. The cross section of the reaction is often measured relative to a low energy resonance, the strength of which must therefore be determined precisely. Purpose: The activation method, based on the measurement of 15 O decay, has not been used in modern measurements of the 14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction. The aim of the present work is to provide strength data for two resonances in the 14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction using the activation method. The obtained values are largely independent from previous data measured by in-beam γ spectroscopy and are free from some of their systematic uncertainties. Method: Solid state TiN targets were irradiated with a proton beam provided by the Tandetron accelerator of Atomki using a cyclic activation. The decay of the produced 15 O isotopes was measured by detecting the 511 keV positron annihilation γ rays. Results: The strength of the E p = 278 keV resonance was measured to be ωγ 278 = (13.4 ± 0.8) meV while for the E p = 1058 keV resonance ωγ 1058 = (442 ± 27) meV. Conclusions: The obtained E p = 278 keV resonance strength is in fair agreement with the values recommended by two recent works. However, the E p = 1058 keV resonance strength is about 20% higher than the previous value. The discrepancy may be caused in part by a previously neglected finite target thickness correction. As only the low energy resonance is used as a normalization point for cross section measurements, the calculated astrophysical reaction rate of the 14 N(p, γ) 15 O reaction and therefore the astrophysical consequences are not changed by the present results.
“…Its S-factor curve is essentially flat over a wide energy range [18], indicating a dominance of direct capture and capture through very wide resonances. Indeed, the 6.79 MeV transition plays only a secondary role for the low-energy resonance at E = 259 keV [27,28], which has recently emerged as a precise normalization point [17,25,26,33,34]. The transition has not even been detected in the subsequent resonance at E = 987 keV [35].…”
The 14 N(p,γ) 15 O reaction is the slowest reaction of the carbon-nitrogen cycle of hydrogen burning and thus determines its rate. The precise knowledge of its rate is required to correctly model hydrogen burning in asymptotic giant branch stars. In addition, it is a necessary ingredient for a possible solution of the solar abundance problem by using the solar 13 N and 15 O neutrino fluxes as probes of the carbon and nitrogen abundances in the solar core. After the downward revision of its cross section due to a much lower contribution by one particular transition, capture to the ground state in 15 O, the evaluated total uncertainty is still 8%, in part due to an unsatisfactory knowledge of the excitation function over a wide energy range. The present work reports precise S-factor data at twelve energies between 0.357-1.292 MeV for the strongest transition, capture to the 6.79 MeV excited state in 15 O, and at ten energies between 0.479-1.202 MeV for the second strongest transition, capture to the ground state in 15 O. An R-matrix fit is performed to estimate the impact of the new data on astrophysical energies. The recently suggested slight enhancement of the 6.79 MeV transition at low energy could not be confirmed. The present extrapolated zero-energy S-factors are S6.79(0) = 1.24±0.11 keV barn and SGS(0) = 0.19±0.05 keV barn.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.