1990
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.41.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Lamb shift in then= 2 state of muonium

Abstract: We report the results of a measurement of the Lamb shift in the n =2 state of muonium. Muonium atoms in the metastable 2S state were produced by the beam-foil method and the formation rate was determined by observation of the Ly-a photons emitted when the metastable atoms were quenched in a static electric field. The Lamb shift (4'&") was measured through observation of the microwave-induced 2'S&&2-2'P&&2 transition with the result $&"=1042» MHz. This result is in agreement with the current theoretical value.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the error is in fact dominated by the QED computation and estimated by the O(m µ α 8 ln 3 α) contribution. The best experimental neasurement at the moment [37] is…”
Section: B Muoniummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the error is in fact dominated by the QED computation and estimated by the O(m µ α 8 ln 3 α) contribution. The best experimental neasurement at the moment [37] is…”
Section: B Muoniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, the blue curve represents the bound coming from the product of the measurement of the electron gyromagnetic factor ae [14,15] and the muonic aµ [16] while the red curve is the current bound extracted by Ps 1S−2S transition [13,23]. The green curve corresponds to the current sensitivity of the Lamb Shift measurement [37]. The dashed red curve is the 1S − 2S projected sensitivity assuming that the experimental precision will match the theoretical one [21].…”
Section: B Muoniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once this is done (1.3) makes sense, but also seems to require that physical quantities must depend in detail on the value of the regularization scale , which seems odd given we at this point only needed to choose to be small and not precisely equal to the physical 4 'Unfortunately' because if shared by spin-half particles such effects have the right size and sign to have accounted for the experimental 'proton-radius' discrepancy [5,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] without the need for exotic new interactions [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Jhep07(2017)072mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Deser formula is also of practical value since trading (or 0 ) for the contact-interaction scattering length, a s , again leads to (3.3). 16 It is useful to quote these results in a more transparent way. For these purposes recall that a potential of the form V = h eff δ 3 (x) naively shifts atomic energy levels by an amount…”
Section: Jhep07(2017)072mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile the 1 s-2s transition has been measured neither for muonic 3He nor for 4He. (We note that the 2s-2p Lamb shift in muonium has also been measured with an uncertainty of 20 MHz [18]. ) We believe that a measurement of the electronic l.y-2.v transition in muonic helium with the muon in the ground state is possible and therefore discuss below its frequency as well as the one for the 2s-2p Lamb shift.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%