2011
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1795-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the jet fragmentation function and transverse profile in proton–proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

Abstract: The jet fragmentation function and transverse profile for jets with 25 GeV < p T jet < 500 GeV and |η jet | < 1.2 produced in proton-proton collisions with a center-ofmass energy of 7 TeV are presented. The measurement is performed using data with an integrated luminosity of 36 pb −1 . Jets are reconstructed and their momentum measured using calorimetric information. The momenta of the charged particle constituents are measured using the tracking system. The distributions corrected for detector effects are com… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
8
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MC events are also corrected to account for minor differences between data and MC simulation in the muon reconstruction and identification efficiencies by applying p T -and -dependent scale factors. The tracking efficiency in MC simulation [36] is consistent with data and has been confirmed with additional studies of tracking performance in a dense environment [37]. Thus no corrections are applied to the simulation for tracking performance.…”
Section: Event Selectionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The MC events are also corrected to account for minor differences between data and MC simulation in the muon reconstruction and identification efficiencies by applying p T -and -dependent scale factors. The tracking efficiency in MC simulation [36] is consistent with data and has been confirmed with additional studies of tracking performance in a dense environment [37]. Thus no corrections are applied to the simulation for tracking performance.…”
Section: Event Selectionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We recall that the simple formula for m eff = µ 2 + k 2 T + k 2 L − k L leads to m eff = 0.5 GeV if µ is equal to the mass of ρ-resonance since the value of k T = k L = 0.45 GeV (see Ref. [45] for the measurement and Ref. [46]) and reference therein for theoretical discussions).…”
Section: Comparison With the Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall that the simple formula for m eff = µ 2 + k 2 T + k 2 L − k L leads to m eff = 0.5 GeV if µ is equal to the mass of ρ-resonance since the value of k T = k L = 0.45 GeV (see Ref. [73] for the measurement and Ref. [74]) and reference therein for theoretical discussions).…”
Section: Comparison With the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%